And that’s what the board is asserting here… the contract was done illegally.
They aren’t trying to void it over agreement compliance or a impacted party raising a concern… they flat out assert the paper itself was invalid.
Right or wrong… that’s their basis. Claiming it has all these defects that make it void. Not terminating the contract from with it… but calling the wrong thing void on pretenses.
A court of law would have to make that determination. As the Petitioner, the Board would have to show proof that at the time of execution of the Agreement, law prohibited such an agreement. Tough hill for it to climb.