scottieRoss
Well-Known Member
Overall these presentations are very 'curious' to be nice.
For example, 4,000 violations on health inspections (i think this was the number that was quoted) on its own is disingenuous. Health Inspection violations can be as simple as a cleaning chemical spray bottle not labeled. Each individual item is a violation. So, if each inspection had 1 or 2 violations, then they would be 98% scores. Still very very good.
Also, those 4,000 violations represent how many inspections? And what is the total number of inspections in the last almost 10 years. Just saying 4,000 violations could represent 2,000 non-perfect inspections, but still above passing. And out of how many thousands or hundreds of thousands of inspections.
The metric should be how many failing inspections out of how many total inspections
For example, 4,000 violations on health inspections (i think this was the number that was quoted) on its own is disingenuous. Health Inspection violations can be as simple as a cleaning chemical spray bottle not labeled. Each individual item is a violation. So, if each inspection had 1 or 2 violations, then they would be 98% scores. Still very very good.
Also, those 4,000 violations represent how many inspections? And what is the total number of inspections in the last almost 10 years. Just saying 4,000 violations could represent 2,000 non-perfect inspections, but still above passing. And out of how many thousands or hundreds of thousands of inspections.
The metric should be how many failing inspections out of how many total inspections