drnilescrane
Well-Known Member
"Central Florida Tourism Oversight District"
So, who is going to read through the new boundary descriptions and tell us what was added or removed from the district?provides boundaries;
Can you explain this in more general terms? Is this basically saying the board of supervisors (I assume the state board) can change projects based on their discretion. Isn’t that illegal to have the property owner change something because a state run board said so?look at this insane catch-all...
2628 (18) Ancillary powers.—To own, acquire, construct,
2629 reconstruct, equip, operate, maintain, extend, and improve such
2630 other projects as the board of supervisors may in its discretion
2631 find necessary, or that are otherwise authorized by general law
2632 or this act, to accomplish the purposes of this act, and to
2633 exercise through its board of supervisors all powers necessary,
2634 convenient, or proper to carry out the purposes of this act.
I just skimmed it…but it appears to be 100% USDAlook at this insane catch-all...
2628 (18) Ancillary powers.—To own, acquire, construct,
2629 reconstruct, equip, operate, maintain, extend, and improve such
2630 other projects as the board of supervisors may in its discretion
2631 find necessary, or that are otherwise authorized by general law
2632 or this act, to accomplish the purposes of this act, and to
2633 exercise through its board of supervisors all powers necessary,
2634 convenient, or proper to carry out the purposes of this act.
So, who is going to read through the new boundary descriptions and tell us what was added or removed from the district?
Looks like 78 pages of text describing the boundaries.
If this is the correct understanding:I just skimmed it…but it appears to be 100% USDA…
Call the lawyers
Can you explain this in more general terms? Is this basically saying the board of supervisors (I assume the state board) can change projects based on their discretion. Isn’t that illegal to have the property owner change something because a state run board said so?
EDIT: Can they be forced to tear down Dumbo (for example) because the board said so?
It’s politicsCan you explain this in more general terms? Is this basically saying the board of supervisors (I assume the state board) can change projects based on their discretion. Isn’t that illegal to have the property owner change something because a state run board said so?
EDIT: Can they be forced to tear down Dumbo (for example) because the board said so?
So you’re still giving credence to stupidity…even though you have “no dog in the fight”?Just like I posted, the bill will replace the current board with a 5 member board appointed by the Governor. What is a little surprising that the board members cannot be employees of a theme park (i.e. no Disney employees will be allowed to serve on the board). Further it states there will be a chief administrator, but there is no statement regarding if the administrator can or can not be theme park employee. Now the fun begins. Will Disney try to fight or just accept. Let the games begin.
Presumably they can't just accept this as they'd be handing a very hostile Florida government a huge amount of power over their operations in the state. Even if DeSantis now promises to play nice in return for a political victory, who's to say how future governments would use this power over them?Will Disney try to fight or just accept.
You gotta figure the trakkers are worried they might have to get a real job if they never build a new ride again…78 pages of legal jargon… I’ll wait for the movie.
I wonder which YouTube channel will get their summary up first.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.