Mr.Skunkape
Well-Known Member
Muskrat moonshine time.
There actually are in-park mugs, but they can only be used in the park. They have them at Restarantasarus when we were there in April. They are green and white and they are refillable. I don't know if all the parks have them. As many times as we've been, we had no idea they existed until April.I said earlier in the thread that I would love to see them have an "in park" option added on, like it sounds like are planning for the water parks. I would fully expect it to cost something like $25 or $30 for a length of stay, but I think most people who are spending their days in the parks would get a lot more use out of it.
So when I buy a Dining Plan these mugs are still going to be included right?
The problem is, they couldn't prove it was the results of downloading. The high cost of CDs, coupled with the presence of only one or two songs on the CD people wanted, is the widely-accepted attributed cause of the decrease in sales of music
And no doubt that people did see Napster and other file-sharing services as a way to get free music. However, the RIAA had no real proof that people would have purchased that music without the availablility of free downloads.
Yes it is. For health purposes, you shouldn't be drinking during meals anyway. But that aside, there is no law that prevents you from not purchasing a beverage with your meal, nor does Disney require the purchase of a beverage with your meal.
Again, those paterns would not be the same were the ability to "abuse" the system not present. Let's assume that Disney can predict that the number of people drinking a beverage with their meal are the same regardless of the availability of the current refill system. Disney does not know that person A, who used an old water bottle to get his soda, would purchase a drink because that soda now requires RFID. They have no way of knowing what they are losing, income-wise. At best it would be a wild guess, based on your speculation of Disney's analysis of crowd patterns. Regardless, over the course of the year, it's probably pretty negligible.
I don't disagree...but I think we can agree Disney is doing this to get more money from guests, and not because they want to stop "abuse" but simply because they want that money
There is a big difference in the 2 when pre-booking comes into play.You're right, why go to Disney where those paying extra to stay on property get treated to a couple of opportunities to by-pass the lines. They will be MUCH better off at Universal, where those who stay on property get to by-pass EVERY line. Wait, what, what was your point? Something about Disney actually being fair and people over-reacting, was that it? Were you using irony or sarcasm?
I learned from this thread that a lot of people drink a lot of soda.
Glad I drink water.
Because the "losses" are neglible. Businesses eat these kind of losses every day, and sadly, it's the cost of doing business. However, what makes it a money grab is the illogical increase in price. They aren't just eliminating abuse of the system, they are gouging customers in the process. And to be clear, this isn't some move on their part to prevent the abuse...they simply want more money...the cost increase pretty much proves it has nothing to do with abuse. It's just a convenient result.
exactly! Disney didn't expect people returning as often as they do. Which puzzles me because Disney created the return guest by DVC.Once upon a time no one anticipated that people would want to vacation at WDW multiple times in one year, or that locals would visit as frequently as they do. Or did, depending upon who you talk to.
I wonder if Disney will have to address the free refill policy for life? Will people complain and a CM will issue them a RFID sticker for their lenght of stay? That sticker can be placed on their Dixie Landing mug. Doesn't really matter for me since I do the DP and the mug being included. Maybe Disney should just include a mug with park tickets? AP gets 6 RFID visits per year?I think it is more along the line as something that was promised, through signage and advertising, as a benefit to entice you to use a service.
I bought a car in the past at a dealership that used to provide a free loaner when your car was being worked on. Now they get you a rental at a reduced rate. I wasn't "stealing" the service while using it, but would be stealing it now if I just took a car anyway, because I was accustomed to getting one free while my car was being serviced.
That doesn't mean that I didn't tell them that I disliked the "new" policy. As many are doing here. But I would not try to circumvent it, even if I could.
My question would be, if you have bought a mug and the rollout takes place midway through your vacation would they exchange your old mug you purchased earlier in the week for a new RFID one without the upcharge or will it be a "well, here's your new mug, now you buy the soda". That's ridiculous.
You do know, that ANYONE can purchase that option, right? That a guest staying at the Days Inn can purchase an unlimited Express Pass for both parks? And it still comes out to be cheaper than staying at a Universal Resort (for now, anyway). But acknowledging that would ruin your self-righteous indignation.
Why? Are you really going to drink an entire mug in less than five minutes?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.