David S.
Member
Alright here we go.
You are being a troll because you are freaking out and lashing out at everyone because one of the rides you liked and as well as a land you liked are being destroyed. Look I'm sorry that you are this upset but don't take it out on the whole forum. Tone it down is all I'm asking.
Uh, no. I didn't "lash out" at anyone. The only one I was short with was one member who personally insulted me first! You are asking me not to passionately express my opinions about what I am losing, but there is nothing wrong with my doing so. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. I am not trying to "rain on the parade" of those who are happy that what I am losing is being destroyed, I am just trying to state my own unique opinion and pay tribute to and respect to beloved favorites.
And secondly, arent DL and Tokyo now the only ones with a Toontown? They aren't in every castle style park. Unlike those Toontowns, ours was meant to be temporary. Its a shell of what a Toontown should be. I would like to see the Fab 5 get their own park many years down the line. I love touring through the houses, but I'd prefer something new and fresh to something dilapidated and temporary. I'm sorry you don't feel the same way. As I said MANY times before, you are entitled to your own opinion.
Ours was meant to be "temporary" WHEN it was "Mickey's Birthdayland". The Toontown Fair upgrade brought it up to par with Disneyland's EXCEPT for lacking the Roger Rabbit ride and Downtown sections. But like DL, we have Mickey and Minnie's House, and Donald's Boat. Barnstormer can even be considered an upgrade to Gadget's Go Coaster, because of the two-train operation and being themed to a more beloved, universally-known character.
Thirdly, that is a gross extrapolation of what I said. You made the argument that DL has many classic dark rides, and thats the reason it was better. I would PREFER fresh, original rides verses clones. The attractions you described are E-Tickes, Snow White wasn't. Again, it sucked. There isn't any comparison to the other dark rides in Fantasyland, and can't even hold a candle to the mountains.
Those stories that you refer to are wonderful, yes, but the parks should be unique. Why would I go to Disneyland if its just like Disney World? Each park should have new and unique experiences. This expansion is bringing us fresh, new classics (for the most part). If it were just clones or better versions of said dark rides, I would be utterly furious. Beauty and the Beast, Snow White, and TLM are now being told in a unique way. Be happy.
And for the record, Toad was just as bad as SW in my opinion. And this is coming from the person that has to be pried away from POTC, HM, and PPF.
This is all just down to opinion. Maybe I want what I consider the classics from DL because WDW is 5-10 minutes from my seasonal home and DL is 40 hours (I don't fly). Ever think of that? I could give a rats patootie if what we get can be found in another park thousands of miles away if it's an attraction I enjoy and would make me happy to have in my "home" Castle Park I visit the most. I don't have the need to say "We have something the other resorts don't". I get no joy, or satisfaction from that whatsoever. If someone from Cali loved The Great Movie Ride and DCA decided to add it, I wouldn't think "Oh no, one less WDW exclusive". Instead, I'd be happy that more people would get a chance to enjoy this classic attraction!
And to an extent, the E-ticket thing is just a matter of personal taste. Yes, I know Disney once classified as such, but my point is, if DL had a Mansion and MK didn't, all the fanboys would be foaming with glee if one was announced for MK. The only difference between this and my desire to get the classic DL Fantasyland dark rides into the MK, is that my favorites tend to be the more quaint, charming, short-but-sweet so-called "C-ticket" Fantasyland dark rides, which are the most important part of a "Castle Park" for my taste. They are MY "E-tickets", as is Snow White and Toontown.