Hmm, so does that mean you are equating most sarcastic with the best use of sarcasm? :veryconfuDarkMarik368 said:Wow not only is disney magical but after reading this forum it obviously attracts the most sarcastic people in the world. JUst goes to show that disney does in fact have the best of the best
Tramp said:Even the dumbest among us know that the easiest way into the park without paying for parking is to cross the median divider into oncoming lanes just before the gates and then back in. :hammer:
DMC-12 said:That works... but... I find paradropping (past the gate perimeter) from a military cargo aircraft is much easier.
That or loading the car into a semi trailer (ala 'Knight Rider') and just back out of the semi once you get past the gates. :lookaroun
:lol:
DarkMarik368 said:There is only one flaw in the plan. Disney is a no fly zone I belive but did you ever considerpossibly unground like a giant drill machine.
hypercatmatt04 said:I heard that if yiuu aloufr juua jneou tcbah nuahy oue.
I know I can't say it ! :lookarounedwardtc said:Ya don't say.....?
no shibby?hypercatmatt04 said:I heard that if yiuu aloufr juua jneou tcbah nuahy oue.
I can officially say that the no fly zone does not exist. I have seen up to three planes over MK at one point, flown over dtd and seen two heli's go over ToT.....DarkMarik368 said:There is only one flaw in the plan. Disney is a no fly zone I belive but did you ever considerpossibly unground like a giant drill machine.
wdwishes2005 said:I can officially say that the no fly zone does not exist. I have seen up to three planes over MK at one point, flown over dtd and seen two heli's go over ToT.....
I think Officially it does exist!!wdwishes2005 said:I can officially say that the no fly zone does not exist. I have seen up to three planes over MK at one point, flown over dtd and seen two heli's go over ToT.....
Also see:http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030511-disney01.htmA federal judge Thursday refused to lift the no-fly zone over Walt Disney World so that an anti-homosexuality group could fly banners over the amusement park during the annual Gay Days celebration.
The Family Policy Network had wanted to fly banners reading "JESUS CHRIST: HOPE FOR HOMOSEXUALS.COM" during the 13th annual celebration, which began Thursday. The four-day event, which is not sponsored by Disney, is expected to draw more than 100,000 gays.
The Virginia-based network sued the Federal Aviation Administration and other federal agencies, saying the anti-terrorism flight restrictions - approved by Congress in February - violated its free-speech rights.
Planes must remain at least 3,000 feet above the park or stay at least 3.3 miles away. The rules also cover Disneyland in Anaheim, Calif.
During the hour-long hearing, Justice Department attorney Brian Kennedy argued that the First Amendment had little to do with it.
"The problem is not that it's an attractive target for speech," Kennedy said. "The problem is, it's an attractive target."
U.S. District Judge Anne Conway said that she did not believe she had jurisdiction over FAA policies, and that the network did not meet the burden of proof.
Disney has said it wants the no-fly zone maintained, but Gay Days organizers sided with the Family Policy Network.
"I don't believe the no-fly zone should be there," Chris Alexander-Manley, Gay Days director of marketing, told the Orlando Sentinel. "There was one group that was planning to fly a banner welcoming everybody."
On January 23, 2004, Congress returned to the topic in passing another appropriations act— Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-199, § 521, 118 Stat. 3, 343 (2004). As before, the act required the FAA to keep the sporting-event no-fly zones of Notice 2/0199 in effect.
§ 521(a)(1). This time, however, Congress required the no-fly zones over Walt Disney World and Disneyland, created by Notices 3/2122 and 3/2123 respectively, to be maintained and included a slightly modified waiver provision. Id. The new waiver provision again limited the FAA’s authority to grant waivers, permitting it to do so only for narrow reasons, including “with respect to an event, stadium, or other venue . . . for operational purposes.” § 521(a)(2)(B)(i). Unlike the former provision, the new one did not allow the FAA to modify the waiver procedure in one year.
cikacz1981 said:if you go to one of the hotels like the Polynesian or Grand Floridian and say at the gate to the guard that you're visiting a guest than you can just take the monorail. You get free parking and you beat the crazy traffic going home. Another one is the Boardwalk and then just walk to Epcot.
57 more days till Disney:sohappy:
Corrus said:And get towed after 4 hours...
Sweet dreams
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.