Which makes these cuts potentially counter productive since a very possible cause of this downward trend is the diminished guest experience. Negatively impacting it further is not a viable solution.perhaps their concern is not so much about when it will correct itself, but how it happened in the first place.
I posted these in another thread — threw them together quickly with attendance data.
View attachment 315688View attachment 315689
I’m actually surprised that Epcot had growth, unless it somehow got a push from Frozen?And here's the percent change numbers for just 2016 to 2017...
View attachment 315692
So, while MK and DHS remained virtually the same, it was Epcot that saw a significant uptick from the DAK growth.
While it's certainly possible that this year (calendar 2018) is going to be bad for Epcot, the narrative that it's been backsliding for a while isn't the case. Epcot has seen marginal growth every year for the past decade (with 2018 being an unknown at this point) except for a tiny backslide in 2010 (following the Great Recession).
View attachment 315693
And yes, TEA doesn't have exact numbers, but they use the same metrics every year, so, a year-to-year change is likely to be noted mostly accurately.
Hollywood studios drew 10.7M guests in 2017, a year when it had reduced capacity and was not that crowded. 29k/day. SWGE seems to be a bigger land than Pandora, and will get as crowded if WDW lets it. Pandora's per-day attendance boost was around 9k, and it didn't make the rest of that park crowded. I can see more people wandering into the land to browse w/o FP+ when the waits are bad. The land might experience closures, but I don't think it will cause DHS to hit capacity. I remember my first visit to AK after Pandora in July and I was amazed how empty Everest was. I think you'll see shorter lines at TSL which many will really enjoy, as well as for people like me who love RnRC & ToT, shorter lines there. Will Mickey & Minnie Railway be a tier 1 FP? Will they want to use that to draw people out of SWGE? Will the TSL rides stay tier 1's. SW is already a draw to HS with Jedi Training, Launch Bay, the shows and marches, and to some extent Star Tours (one of my two memories of visiting MGM 20 years ago). SWGE will be insanely crowded, but the rest of the park will be OK. Baseline taphouse will do massive business for the people waiting on Grand Ave to get in.Bad:
Good:
- I think overcrowding will be a real problem. The land and park will have difficulty absorbing the mobs — most certainly initially and maybe for some time.
- I think that SWGE is likely to draw some visitors who have not been into Parks before now — at least once. A certain percentage will get hooked into return trips — customer acquisition. I doubt this effect was measurable with Pandora, so I’d expect greater things on this front — not that we’ll ever have hard data to prove this either way.
- I’d suspect this could increase attendance in other parks some — perhaps AK esp. with FoP and Pandora still being new-ish. This was not observed with Pandora 2016-2017, but we don’t even have one full year of data on that yet. Here, I think we have people putting off trips until after SWGE opens, and presumably they will go to more than just DHS.
Or the perpetual festivals? When did the last one kick in?I’m actually surprised that Epcot had growth, unless it somehow got a push from Frozen?
Completely agree. And considering that more cuts are on the way, they apparently refuse to at least consider that their very own actions possibly caused this in the first place. I have no doubt their solution will be an attempt to raise per guest capita. They continue to convince themselves that the actual theme park experience is enhanced when the guest spends more money.Which makes these cuts potentially counter productive since a very possible cause of this downward trend is the diminished guest experience. Negativity impacting it further is not a viable solution.
Which makes these cuts potentially counter productive since a very possible cause of this downward trend is the diminished guest experience. Negatively impacting it further is not a viable solution.
Agreed — I think this is a really good point.Completely agree. And considering that more cuts are on the way, they apparently refuse to at least consider that their very own actions possibly caused this in the first place. I have no doubt their solution will be an attempt to raise per guest capita. They continue to convince themselves that the actual theme park experience is enhanced when the guest spends more money.
Absolutely.Sounds like they also overreacted with cuts last Jan-Feb. I’m hoping they don’t repeat that — despite how freaked out they may be about current attendance..
Reduced selective operating hours. Reduced staffing levels. Deferred maintenance.What else is there?
However: how much do the announced cuts actually impact guest satisfaction — understanding that there may be more to come? When you cut hours significantly that hits everyone. I don’t think this will be true at all with cuts to shamans, streetmosphere, Rafiki. What else is there?
Perhaps they could offer a hard ticket event where the guests can pay to be the CM's and operate the attractions for other guests and also perform various custodial work. They could also use the CM apartments as a "boutique resort" and charge people to stay there.Reduced selective operating hours. Reduced staffing levels. Deferred maintenance.
With record high airline travel and Florida set to hit a record high in visitors this year, for WDW's numbers to be cratering this fall has too throw up a red flag or two to Disney.
I blame F&W Fest, ie "Drunkytown!"
I think it is a plethora of reasons like people being overwhelmed with all the planning required before the vacation, then the regimented "every second planned out" exhausting and frustrating nature of the vacation, the crowds, the price, and the frat party known as F&W.I think F&W is still a draw. I think it's unpleasant (for me) because of the heat this time of year, but I'm guessing the issues affecting attendance drill deeper than the popularity of a single event or a single Park.
Disney reminds me of the drug addict the more they use the more they want. Disney's drug is profits the more they make the more they want. Cutting park hours, CM and actors based on an attendance dip --- how much does that improve their their bottom line when compared to the billions in profit--- I would guess not much. does it affect guest satisfaction I would guess yes and guest satisfaction is what their business is all about.
I totally agree on this! I think it’s a matter of degree and how much each incremental change impacts guest experience.It will negatively impact all guests experience even if they don’t recognize exactly why.
The majority of guests don’t visit RPW but all guests will feel the rest of the park being busier as capacity is cut.
The Disney experience is a collection of thousands of small details. Like a woven fabric if you start to cut threads the whole thing will quickly unravel.
I think it is a plethora of reasons like people being overwhelmed with all the planning required before the vacation, then the regimented "every second planned out" exhausting and frustrating nature of the vacation, the crowds, the price, and the frat party known as F&W.
You’re not supposed to enjoy your vacation. How selfish of you.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.