bluerhythym
Well-Known Member
The bay used to look so nice, with the waves and lack of machinery. Now it looks like a mall fountain.
They're actually two separate bodies of water, with a wall running below the Avalon Cove bridge. When Paradise Bay was drained for World of Color construction, there was no impact on GRR's operations. The area near the Wharf was designed to look like a tidal basin, so that if/when GRR goes down, it simply looks like the tide coming in. For all of the failures of DCA's initial build and budget, I agree that this is actually a really clever and elegant solution
A similar trick was used way back in 1959 to separate the chlorinated water of the Submarine Lagoon from the park-wide green water system that supplied the Motor Boat Cruise, using an Autopia bridge to conceal the wall. During the 2005-07 conversion to Nemo, they filled in that part of the Motor Boat Cruise waterway and built new rockwork in the Sub lagoon, but the wall under the causeway remains, even though its purpose no longer does
As for the color of the water, Paradise Bay used to be dyed a rather electric shade of blue. They haven't dyed it since refilling it in late 2009 (Presumably due to the World of Color equipment, I guess? The Fantasmic! fountains seem to manage just fine in dyed water), instead letting guests look into the murky, brown, algae-filled world below the surface. The GRR water is slightly chlorinated since it splashes guests, and is much clearer than Paradise Bay
I think you are misunderstanding what I'm saying, and taking what I'm saying and making it specific to you.
Its fine to have a discussion on what our "thoughts" are of the changes. But when ideas of specific changes are brought up without confirmation it leads to emotions and panic of those changes, all based on someones idea. So while I can appreciate your ideas of "what could happen", it better to discuss things more broadly for now. Once more details are released then we can start to debate the more granular points of the project. Anyways just my two cents.
what a big mistake it was to merge both attractions together.
I don't think the Fantasyland version should have stayed, but the newer combined track layout seems so much more boring than either original (though I do like the cute little off-road part). Time to use this land for something exciting and build a more modest-sized Cars-themed replacement in DCA.You think so? Two versions of the same ride in two different lands never made much sense to me.
Is that why you can now see an entire bed full of coins around pacific wharf? That is such an eyesore.As for the color of the water, Paradise Bay used to be dyed a rather electric shade of blue. They haven't dyed it since refilling it in late 2009 (Presumably due to the World of Color equipment, I guess? The Fantasmic! fountains seem to manage just fine in dyed water), instead letting guests look into the murky, brown, algae-filled world below the surface.
This would make sense as an overlay for next year's Pixar Fest...but this is all sounding like its intended to be permanent. And if they don't add another attraction down the line, this will be just as lackluster as it sounds and make the pier continue to be one of my least-visited areas of DCA.I understand this is meant to be a "quick turnaround" but what sense does it truly make to slap on some billboards with Pixar characters, throw the ball onto the pier with water around it and put up a new "theater" for meet and greets and NOT re-theme all of the attractions on the Pier? (and not saying they won't down the road but what sense does it make to have some of it be Pixar and other parts still be Goofy, etc.) Either do it right and full on or don't bother, IMHO ... they really should have released more details on this
We haven't really kicked around what the food options will become in Pixar Land.
Quick question. Have you ever stayed at PP before?
No. Why?
Isn't this fun!They're actually two separate bodies of water, with a wall running below the Avalon Cove bridge. When Paradise Bay was drained for World of Color construction, there was no impact on GRR's operations. The area near the Wharf was designed to look like a tidal basin, so that if/when GRR goes down, it simply looks like the tide coming in. For all of the failures of DCA's initial build and budget, I agree that this is actually a really clever and elegant solution
A similar trick was used way back in 1959 to separate the chlorinated water of the Submarine Lagoon from the park-wide green water system that supplied the Motor Boat Cruise, using an Autopia bridge to conceal the wall. During the 2005-07 conversion to Nemo, they filled in that part of the Motor Boat Cruise waterway and built new rockwork in the Sub lagoon, but the wall under the causeway remains, even though its purpose no longer does
As for the color of the water, Paradise Bay used to be dyed a rather electric shade of blue. They haven't dyed it since refilling it in late 2009 (Presumably due to the World of Color equipment, I guess? The Fantasmic! fountains seem to manage just fine in dyed water), instead letting guests look into the murky, brown, algae-filled world below the surface. The GRR water is slightly chlorinated since it splashes guests, and is much clearer than Paradise Bay
I don't want to bias your opinion of your stay there, but just make sure you have a plan for the elevator fiasco (typical wait is around 30 minutes). It's minimally themed for a Disney resort (because it was bought from an outside company instead of being designed by Disney) and should be about $200 less a night (think value resort in WDW). We ended up having to take the stairs from the 10th floor everyday to make sure we could get to the park on time to get fastpasses and such. Carrying a week's worth of luggage downstairs to check out 10 flights of stairs also isn't too magical.
I sincerely hope your visit is better than the normal experience and hope you guys have a great time!!
Those tricky imagineersI thought so. Thanks for clearing it up!
Fun fact! Don't recall where I read/heard it though. Oh, now I do. David Younger Theme Park Design. But the bear icon was supposed to be on the perimeter of the park, facing in, duh, so people could actually see it. Being a water ride that drains at night its typical for water rides to be on the perimeter of a park, near backstage, near draining facilities. This was going to take up a ton of room though. Somebody had a good idea, shockingly, when it came to laying out DCA 1.0: Use Paradise Pier as the retention facility.
Does this trigger anybody else's PTSD?
(video title misleading; it is a collection of media, channel news, and TV promo specials for dca 1.0)
In another universe with twice the budget and half the puns, DCA would have successfully pulled off the California theme and the themes presented in a show like golden dreams would still exist.
I'm not sure if this is true. The earliest concept art for DCA that I know of, while featuring a very different (and more coherent) layout for Paradise Pier and Grizzly Peak, has the latter located approximately where it is currently, with water features that clearly were intended for retention. If this is true, the change happened very early in the design process.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.