nevol
Well-Known Member
As tacky and cheap as everything was, it's nice to see footage of the park that was mostly IP-free, and when guests were still flying over California and not the Taj Mahal.
The people being interviewed were genuinely excited about the park; John McClintock said "This park is maybe a little more real possibly a little more sophisticated than Disneyland." Steve Miller's head was in the right place, though, in his appreciation of Soarin' and golden dreams' spot as the heart/soul/justification for the park being based on California. The offerings with the most potential stood out to him. Followed up by an interview with Liz, VP Brand Strategy who fully embodied the other side of the Disneyland resort roll-out, the one that didn't work, the one they'll continue to erase through the early 2020's-cool, hip, pop, downtown Disney, etc around the 15 minute mark. I'm glad wine country and the food shows are still there, but what is absent still is a more emotional and less cold justification for a theme park about California. They tried a ton of stuff that didn't work but rather than saying "California doesn't work, let's abandon it," I think that gets them closer to finding what does work, if they had the will to try again. The under-performance of ITTBAB, Muppets, Honey, I shrunk the audience provided them useful feedback about how the audience mix in California is less receptive of theater shows, whereas in Orlando people visit less so those shows have more staying power. How they approached California didn't work, as 3d shows haven't worked, but I think there is room for California still, just as there is room for 3d shows still; not in a passive movie theater format, but in Midway Mania, Battle Escape, star tours, Avengers Coaster.
+The failure of 1.0 and success of 2.0 is attributable to so many things, but the biggest takeaway by the company that they are rolling out everywhere now seems to be that
a. Theme parks with original themes are a liability, and
b. The easiest way to improve said theme parks is through IP
DL Resort runs like a well-oiled machine now, no doubt about it. It is the success of DCA 2.0 that guarantees, for the time being, that everything everywhere will be an IP-driven mashup of Disney Hollywood Studios and Disneyland/Magic Kingdom. Hopefully the new Mission: Space enhancements and restaurant are insanely popular, as well as the Disneyland Railroad when it returns, because I'm having a hard time thinking about any other projects in development right now or that have opened recently that aren't IP-driven. (Mystic Manor... strongest attraction at HKDL, but it didn't spark similar attractions elsewhere just yet) Restaurants around DAK etc aside. Not to just hate on IP's, that isn't my point. Flight of Passage appears to handle it really well and create a fantasy pedagogical attraction that is subtle but reinforces the park's values in clear ways. But experimentation is lacking and while now might not be the time to take risks, with DCA's head just above the water, so much in flux out east, Paris and Hong Kong in vulnerable states, experiences like Alien Encounter and Superstar Limo (heck, even Mount Prometheus) aren't to be expected.
I've been busy and only refreshing this thread all week; going to hop over to the wdw thread to see how everyone is feeling about the entrance plaza at epcot etc. Probably 900 pages at this point; hope I make it out alive.
Last edited: