yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
He can take as much credit as he wants for that project. It paid off in almost none of the ways it was meant to.Ah, so let me understand. So Paul, who drove the entire project and who’s financial credibility with Staggs and the board was key to getting the funding does not get credit for the expansion, which he oversaw from start to finish.
That’s awesome. Thank your for perfectly illustrating my point.
Disneyland Park has basically always been successful. Disneyland Resort, as Pressler tooled it, has basically always had problems. More recently, the problems of Disneyland Resort have started to infect the success of Disneyland Park. Even before the current tragedy the resort was reeling in ways resultant from his bungling of the DL Resort Project.
Not really sure you're making the point you think you are. Maybe consider a different example?
Just because there's good and bad to everything doesn't mean it can't circumstantially be determined that one may outweigh the other. Pressler did noticeably more bad for DL than he did good. The only reason Disney Fans are so quick to jump to that conclusion is because we're the only ones who know or care enough about it to have an opinion - that we all basically have the same one is less a coincidence or conspiracy and more a byproduct.
Last edited: