In your opinion, who's TLand is better?
I've been to both, and they both have their strengths and weaknesses. I honestly don't think I could choose.
Here's a comparison of advantages and disadvantages:
Disneyland:
+ better Space Mountain ride
+ Star Tours
+ Tomorrowland Terrace (they have a cool stage that rises in and out of the ground)
+ Finding Nemo Submarine Voyage (amazing experience)
+ Autopia (much more fun than the Indy Speedway
+ Monorail moving in and out of the land
= Buzz Lightyear (detachable guns, but not as good queue or screen room)
- Astro Orbitor (on the ground level, causes big traffic problems)
- Honey I Shrunk the Audience
- feels dead, no vitality, eg empty PeopleMover tracks, and non-moving sculpture where Oribtor should be
Magic Kingdom
+ bigger, cooler Space Mountain
+ Astro Orbitor (a much more beautiful centerpiece to the land than DL has)
+ TTA (this is a HUGE plus, in what it brings in vitality and theme to the land)
+ Carousel of Progress (another huge plus, in how well it really is what Tomorrowland is supposed to be all about)
+ Much more lively to be in, with a more unified theme, and more aesthetics and motion
= Buzz (not as high-tech as DL's, but better queue and has a "grander" feel, and not to mention the cool giant screen room)
- Stitch
- Indy Speedway
- arguably, MI Laugh Floor
I hope that's a good run-down of both lands. I guess you could say Disneyland has better attractions, and Magic Kingdom has a better overall atmosphere.
... What was the thread subject again?? :veryconfu :lookaroun