twilight mitsuk
Well-Known Member
There are no other trains to avoid with the airport trams. They just go back and forth.
sames goes the for the Hogwarts express
There are no other trains to avoid with the airport trams. They just go back and forth.
sames goes the for the Hogwarts express
Question- I am seeing people post on other sites that Disney has made official announcements / releases that confirm that new monorails have been ordered, but no links.
I know about Gurr's statement, but that is not an official announcement. What I have seen from our insiders on here, they believe something is / may be executed with Bombardier, but no firm details.
Everything else appears speculation / guesswork on our part (which has been pretty good- like with the gondola system)
Am I missing something?
Right now if Iger said water was wet, I would probably check myself before I accepted his wordBob Iger just tweeted “I can has Monorailz”
And my teenage daughter loves the subs, thinks they are charming, and insists on doing them every trip.My daughters (Twin 12s and 15) thought the DL subs were, in order, "lame", "boring" and "that was the dumbest thing Ive ever been on...and Ive seen Stitch".
Hogwarts Express is even simpler. The two trains are connected, so it is just one system.sames goes the for the Hogwarts express
Question- I am seeing people post on other sites that Disney has made official announcements / releases that confirm that new monorails have been ordered, but no links.
I know about Gurr's statement, but that is not an official announcement. What I have seen from our insiders on here, they believe something is / may be executed with Bombardier, but no firm details.
Everything else appears speculation / guesswork on our part (which has been pretty good- like with the gondola system)
Am I missing something?
I'd be totally down for a copy of the Tokyo waterless submarine ride. If you've never seen it, it's kind of a cross between the old 20K ride and the Peter Pan ride system. Very effective.Im an old guy...I know those rides and have ridden them both more times than I can count. They are old, ugly, slow, cramped and boring. Sorry...nostalgia and length cant save that one. The ride was more valuable for the view than for the actual attraction. Thee was something great about seeing a giant crystal blue lagoon with subs going around. I get it. It was neat. It was/is also firmly rooted in the 1950s and it shows.
My daughters (Twin 12s and 15) thought the DL subs were, in order, "lame", "boring" and "that was the dumbest thing Ive ever been on...and Ive seen Stitch".
To each their own, but IMHO and the opinions of my Disney obsessed family, it is/was a ride that is far past its time, except for those with a nostalgia connection.
I think if that was ever considered, it would have been back when Disney/MGM Studios was being built. At this point, it doesn't make much sense, sadly.I wish these new cars came with a monorail expansion as well. I imagine the Skyliner kills any possibility of connecting the Epcot Monorail line to Hollywood Studios.
*cough* @Rteetz *cough* rumor update?Question- I am seeing people post on other sites that Disney has made official announcements / releases that confirm that new monorails have been ordered, but no links.
I know about Gurr's statement, but that is not an official announcement. What I have seen from our insiders on here, they believe something is / may be executed with Bombardier, but no firm details.
Everything else appears speculation / guesswork on our part (which has been pretty good- like with the gondola system)
Am I missing something?
Disneys worked fine for decades, I think they just waited a bit too long. Personally I think when they went automated they should have bit the bullet. Also orlandos are much newer and the older ones recently replaced.Still amazes me, that the Orlando Intentional Airport, has (and HAS HAD) fully automatic trains for years now and Disney can't get this right.
Even more amazing when you think..
Disney has a IN HOUSE dept that wrote the software for test track, which does a TON more stuff than a Monorail would be required to do.. uses more or less the same concepts (location of car on track, speed, seat-belt status, location of other cars on the track, etc) and yet they still cant get this right.
I agree and could fit into tomorrowland (more paris style) if done right, and throw in a few nostalgic nods to the original 20,000 leagues would make lots happy. Stitch is too small so not sure where they would put it.I'd be totally down for a copy of the Tokyo waterless submarine ride. If you've never seen it, it's kind of a cross between the old 20K ride and the Peter Pan ride system. Very effective.
But I digress. I do think the monorails serve a valuable function and are indelibly tied to WDW. Here's hoping they are able to get them back into tip-top shape.
The same number of non DVC resorts. The infrastructure is based on volume of people not how they paid to stay there.How many DVC resorts must we suffer before infrastructure matters?
The new leg (to south terminal) has multiple trains on the beam. The switch at the stations to the other side.There are no other trains to avoid with the airport trams. They just go back and forth.
Even attractions are not an entirely good comparison. A transit system has to be more flexible. Certain attractions can and do ‘cascade’ into a shut down if there is a delay loading or unloading a train. The monorail needs to be able to handle delays in real time, not shut down and be manually reset.
But I wonder if it could depend on how *much* they paid to stay there? The monorail resorts get a premium not just because they are on the monorail but because they are [relatively] luxurious. With CBR, Pop, and Animation resorts, Disney will get to see how much of a premium they can get for convenient access to two parks that aren't the Magic Kingdom.The same number of non DVC resorts. The infrastructure is based on volume of people not how they paid to stay there.
I don't disagree with you. But I also believe the monorail itself contributes to the premium cost of the monorail resorts. There's not a lot of difference between the luxuriousness of the Contemporary or the Poly compared to Wilderness Lodge. But, because WL is boat only to the MK and bus only to Epcot, it's about half the cost per night compared to Poly, or about 2/3rds that of the Contemporary.But I wonder if it could depend on how *much* they paid to stay there? The monorail resorts get a premium not just because they are on the monorail but because they are [relatively] luxurious. With CBR, Pop, and Animation resorts, Disney will get to see how much of a premium they can get for convenient access to two parks that aren't the Magic Kingdom.
A good result (for TWDC in returns on building the Skyliner) would cement the business case for transportation infrastructure being a good business investment and we could finally start seeing the decline of buses as a primary means of transportation in WDW. Here's to hoping!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.