BoarderPhreak
Well-Known Member
What? Nothing wrong with the monorails. Move along, move along.
One could argue that these days, he's the hardest working man in WDW.WHAT???!!! I want that job, the monorail tug driver! That looks so cool!
Badge of honor!I just know that his personal Twitter blocked me years ago.
another failed opportunity for AAA sponsorship. You know, keeping the highway in the sky traffic free..... LOLOne could argue that these days, he's the hardest working man in WDW.
Replace the tractor's gas engine with an engine from a Model S Tesla and now we are talking cost efficiency.Everybody wants new trains.
But what about just 9 new tractors?
Problem solved.
from what I understand the skyliner is pennies compared to monorails from a cost perspective.
Replace the tractor's gas engine with an engine from a Model S Tesla and now we are talking cost efficiency.
Not too mention constantly leaking into the men's dressing room and the fear it might become unsafe (I was originally hired for 20k back in the day and they had to drain it because the water level was dropping - it was leaking - again - so I was moved over to Grand Prix).20,000 died because it was extremely slow loading, had no ability to retrofit for handicap access, took up massive amounts of space and was (honestly) pretty expensive to operate for as lame as it was.
20K was a nostalgic treat, and I miss it, but I also realize it was just not a ride that would impress anybody now without the nostalgia factor built in. They looked cool, but its a ride that I am happy is gone. The worst part of the whole process was that the lagoon sat empty for years with no replacement.
Given that Ive been on both the old rides and the new version/replacements, WDW got the better outcome.
Brownfield development is often much harder than greenfield.Still amazes me, that the Orlando Intentional Airport, has (and HAS HAD) fully automatic trains for years now and Disney can't get this right.
Even more amazing when you think..
Disney has a IN HOUSE dept that wrote the software for test track, which does a TON more stuff than a Monorail would be required to do.. uses more or less the same concepts (location of car on track, speed, seat-belt status, location of other cars on the track, etc) and yet they still cant get this right.
Maybe, but they're building the Skyliner. It's not proof of anything, but it's at least evidence in the direction that they're not afraid to invest in infrastructure.
Still amazes me, that the Orlando Intentional Airport, has (and HAS HAD) fully automatic trains for years now and Disney can't get this right.
Even more amazing when you think..
Disney has a IN HOUSE dept that wrote the software for test track, which does a TON more stuff than a Monorail would be required to do.. uses more or less the same concepts (location of car on track, speed, seat-belt status, location of other cars on the track, etc) and yet they still cant get this right.
I just know that his personal Twitter blocked me years ago.
I wouldn't use the MCO tram as analogy to the monorail. They're 2 different types of systems. (APM shuttle vs. monorail) Think something more along the lines of the Las Vegas monorail. Also, I think the problem is the aging trains more than anything. Vegas' system is running fine and if it weren't for the aging trains, WDW's probably would be too...
There are no other trains to avoid with the airport trams. They just go back and forth.Eh, I agree on the ageing trains (though MCO's trains aged a bit more gracefully..)
But tech wise, it's still electric motors, rubber tires and a concrete beam-way.
What I'm saying is, this isn't magic rocket tech involved anymore.
Im an old guy...I know those rides and have ridden them both more times than I can count. They are old, ugly, slow, cramped and boring. Sorry...nostalgia and length cant save that one. The ride was more valuable for the view than for the actual attraction. Thee was something great about seeing a giant crystal blue lagoon with subs going around. I get it. It was neat. It was/is also firmly rooted in the 1950s and it shows.Thanks for the chuckle.
A well-rounded experience that last a pretty balanced amount of time vs a one-pump jump mini coaster. LOL
They are far from the same thing. One (MCO) is a single tram that goes back and forth between two stations. No other vehicle occupies the same lane. The other (monorail) is in a constant loop and can share the same beam with up to 5 other vehicles. Apples and oranges my friend.Eh, I agree on the ageing trains (though MCO's trains aged a bit more gracefully..)
But tech wise, it's still electric motors, rubber tires and a concrete beam-way.
What I'm saying is, this isn't magic rocket tech involved anymore.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.