:brick: Too many "what ifs" in your post. This was Kobe's year and the writers agreed. Paul had a great season, but it wasn't to be. You can make arguments for both of them all day long and it was close, but Kobe got the votes.
:brick:right back at ya cuz it couldn't possibly have been any less neccessary...
There were no what if's...
not one... not a single, solitary WHAT IF...
so... where are the "two many what ifs in your post"????
a what if is if I said "what if chris paul had Pau Gasol" or something like that...
I said.. "without chris paul the Hornets are a 30 win team; the lakers are a 40 win team..."
that isn't a what if statement... because I go on to say... HAVING Chris Paul makes them 26 games better... and the Lakers 17-18 games better...
It wasn't "kobe's year."
i don't understand this statement... it's "kobe's year"
why? the lakers were 31-19 before the Gasol trade... and after they were 26-6...
so..... they've won 62% before... and a whopping 82% AFTER THE TRADE...
so... now i will play a whatif... if they don't make the Gasol trade... they're a 51 win team... AND STILL HAVE A BETTER SUPPORTING CAST THEN CP3 HAS...
51 wins lands them tied for the 7th slot...
Kobe is playing with a perrennial All-Star... Chris Paul is playing with guys who wouldn't shine anywhere else because he gets them their every opportunity... David West is very limited offensive but gets numerous open looks because of CP3... he is too undersized at the 4 in the Western Conference to play WITHOUT Chris Paul... Chandeler is simply an athlete who can rebound, Chris Paul gets him open dunks and layups... Peja cannot create his own shot anymore and so he needs CP3 to draw his defender and get open looks... same for Mo Pete...
they have no other playmakers but him...
So again, Kobe is the better talent... Chris Paul provides about 10x more VALUE to his basketball team...
but you probably just looked at stats, listened to the talking heads... and decided "oh its Kobe's year because he's been great for 10 years"
right...
:brick: