I respectfully disagree...
I think Chris Paul did much more for his team... Kobe Bryant is a better basketball player in my mind, definitely, much more pure talent... but that's not the award; it's most VALUABLE player...
Let's take the Lakers WITH Pau Gasol... without Kobe they're probably a... 35 win team at the least... 43 win team at the best... somewhere in the middle... so we'll say a 39 win team without Kobe...
Well they won 57 games so Kobe got them 18 wins...
again this is personal opinion but I think within reason you can agree on that argument right?
Meanwhile; the Hornets won 56 games... I think without CP3 they are at the absolute best a 35 win team... and possibly as bad as a 25 win team...
they're just not that strong without Chris Paul... they literally don't have a playmaker without him... they have solid players, but without Paul to get them open looks and make plays... they wouldn't be getting the looks they're getting...
so I think Chris Paul wins them about 26 games... taking them from a 30 win team to a 56 win team...
Again, I know people will argue that... but that's just the way I see it...
the Lakers were 1 game better than the Hornets... without Paul and Kobe... they're probably close to 10 games better...
So in conclusion... Chris Paul provides more value...
(my personal voting would have gone CP3, KG, THEN Kobe... but... that's just me)