News Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
For real, hp land in every park lol. if disney put a toontown or star wars land in everypark everyone would complain. Plus with jk tweeting all her terrible nonsense it's better not being in a Disney Park imo.
Honestly Star wars could have probably fit in each park (as well as some of the current attractions/lands fit)

MK: Coruscant mini-land in Tomorrowland
EPCOT: Could have been built instead of Guardians, but with the Naboo people instead.
DHS: Give us classic Tatooine
AK: Endor in the style of Pandora
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Rowling's "rage-tweeting" (in other words, her opinion) hasn't hurt her fortune and her IP one bit. Universal's Wizarding World has been enormously successful, so successful that it's being expanded upon in Epic Universe. And a new Harry Potter TV series is in development at HBO. And the Hogwarts Legacy game withstood the wrath of, um, some and became one of the top-selling video games of all time. So Rowling's doing JUUUUSSTTT fine. 😁

If anything, Rowling dodged a bullet by not letting her IP being dumbed-down into a Midway Mania shooter attraction (actual Disney plans, I believe). Universal respected her input (unlike Disney) and built a true wonderland. One that truly fulfills fan's expectations, unlike Galaxy's Edge. Bravo, Universal, for not bowing down to the mob and for not doing a cheap half-baked version of a worldwide publishing phenomenon. Universal gets all the wins.
On the first point, time will tell.

On the second, it seems we both consider Rowling’s decision to go with Universal for the best, so everyone’s a winner!
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
They played this game with GMR. They should have updated that and built MMRR on AC. They didn’t and the park got a new ride but didn’t improve capacity.

Will they do the exact same thing again? If they spent a bit more money and made a new MV film while building Monsters over Launch Bay, the park would be in better position by 2028. For some reason, at DHS, they keep spending $100s of millions to just keep the park treading water while they look to actually expand MK. I don’t get it. They should want to get more people in the second-tier parks instead of trying to somehow get 25 million people into MK.
Like I said a few pages ago, I think DHS actually went backwards in terms of time spent there.

At this point I walk in, do Star Tours (because it's almost a walk on) and Muppets. Stand there and think "Do I want to spend an hour in line for ToT or RnRC" (no). Ignore Slinky and RotR because of their 1+ hour waits. Realize there's no more Citizens of Hollywood. Grab a blue milk and walk to Epcot. It's insane to me how they thought building a park with almost only E-tickets was a good idea when there's not enough to support them.
 

Streetway

Well-Known Member


Mmm... Expansion plots.

I didn’t think that was still the plan. The rumor was it was rip ride rock it that was going. Either way, this does not bode well for muppets. Let’s hope the backlash at removing them has pushed the HOP replacement to a greater chance at reality.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
On the first point, time will tell.

On the second, it seems we both consider Rowling’s decision to go with Universal for the best, so everyone’s a winner!
It can be complicated, but in general I think we have to be able to separate the creator from the creation, especially when we are several steps removed - a theme park land based on films based on a book the creator wrote.

Otherwise, we’re going to run into real problems with some of Walt Disney’s beliefs.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
I didn’t think that was still the plan. The rumor was it was rip ride rock it that was going. Either way, this does not bode well for muppets. Let’s hope the backlash at removing them has pushed the HOP replacement to a greater chance at reality.
We’ve known Simpsons is going for quite some time.

Disney adding a Simpsons land would be nutty. It’s a horribly exhausted franchise, some of the voice actors can barely speak, it clashes with Disney’s overall vibe about as badly as an Aliens ride would, and anything they build will be compared to what Universal had.
 

Streetway

Well-Known Member
We’ve known Simpsons is going for quite some time.

Disney adding a Simpsons land would be nutty. It’s a horribly exhausted franchise, some of the voice actors can barely speak, it clashes with Disney’s overall vibe about as badly as an Aliens ride would, and anything they build will be compared to what Universal had.
I like the simpons. I am biased towards this, because I’d like to see what Disney has up their sleeve for the simpons. It’s a merchandising GIANT, and a franchise Disney has been putting a lot of investment into making them “Disney”. They’re going to come to wdw in some form. It’s inevitable. If I’m honest, i for one welcome our donut loving yellow overlords. I dunno if it’s here yet. I think we’re all going a bit too far deep down the crazy hole here, with the lack of info.
 

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
Poppcock.

There are plenty of non-IP Disney attractions that have gained truly legendary theme park attraction status.

Here's the reality. People know they want what they already understand. So if you ask them on a guest survey, they respond with what they know. And if you react accordingly, you give them what they know. Expectations set. Expectations met. IP. Easy.

But that doesn't mean they wouldn't want something else even more. They just don't KNOW it because the vast majority of us are not ultra-talented, creative people.

Ask people what they wanted in a "theme park" in 1950 and they would respond with what they knew. They would describe their favorites at the local amusement park. Very few would describe anything close to what Disneyland was. And certainly that follows through to the various attractions opened later. Pirates, Haunted, Matterhorn, etc. But that necessitated ANTICPATING the needs and wants of the public. Not so easy. Requires an understanding of what makes the public tick, and the talent and commitment to create things the public didn't even know they wanted.

Early Disney could have given the people what the people asked for. Would have probably been successful financially. Sure as heck would have been cheaper and less risky. But they chose a different path. Clearly it served them well. It's ironic that now, when Disney has resources available that early Disney could only dream of, Disney no longer has the talent or desire to continue on that path. Instead they choose to limit themselves.
"If I had asked my customers what they wanted, they would have said a faster horse." - Henry Ford
 

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
Rowling's rage tweeting has not affected anyone's love for the attractions that Universal has built.... She chose Universal based on proposals by the two companies.... Clearly Disney lost because they were not going to do enough with them...and Universal ran with the ball. I am disappointed that Disney's proposal was not good enough to get the IP...but in the end glad to see it was better and more creatively managed by Universal.
Disney lost her when she uttered the words "I get complete creative control".
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
That’s the killer. Muppets is a great attraction for the park in a dead section of the park. I feel like if it was in, say, echo lake where frozen is, or sunset where BATB is (not in a moving sense, more so if it was there from the start), muppets would 100% be in zero danger. It’s just the location that kills it.

But that doesn't make much sense to me. There's nothing about that location that makes it "good" for Monsters that some other place wouldn't. If the argument were that they were adding more Star Wars and wanted to use it for that, well I think we'd all understand if Muppets went away. But Monsters Inc in the Muppet footprint doesn't solve any problems and if anything is unnecessarily restricting on what they can do with the Monsters.
 
Last edited:

Streetway

Well-Known Member
But that doesn't make much sense to me. There's nothing about that location that makes it "good" for Monsters that some other place wouldn't. If the argument was that they were adding more Star Wars and wanted to use it for that, well I tihnk we'd all understand if Muppets went away. But Monsters in the Muppet footprint doesn't solve any problems and if anything is unnecessarily restricting on what they can do with the Monsters.
My point is, muppets is probably on the clock regardless of where monsters goes. It’s probably gonna get turfed for something eventually. Dhs has a finite amount of space. Eventually, it’s going to be grand avenues turn. Wether that be Star Wars, the simpsons, or something else, that space is probably gonna be used eventually. It sucks, but that’s how Disney kinda is now.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
My point is, muppets is probably on the clock regardless of where monsters goes. It’s probably gonna get turfed for something eventually. Dhs has a finite amount of space. Eventually, it’s going to be grand avenues turn. Wether that be Star Wars, the simpsons, or something else, that space is probably gonna be used eventually. It sucks, but that’s how Disney kinda is now.

There's a ton of actual unused space in the park. and even the option to expand into current parking.

Sure, they might eventually find a need to use the Muppets footprint for something else. that really shouldn't be until after they built like 5-10 additional attractions elsewhere in the park.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Honestly Star wars could have probably fit in each park (as well as some of the current attractions/lands fit)

MK: Coruscant mini-land in Tomorrowland
EPCOT: Could have been built instead of Guardians, but with the Naboo people instead.
DHS: Give us classic Tatooine
AK: Endor in the style of Pandora
Oh I would have loved something like this!!!
Yeah. I do think muppets should find a new shame sooner rather than later though. Doesn’t have to be BIG, just has to live up to the spirit and humor of the originals.
Why? What is the reason they can’t stay where they are?
 

Streetway

Well-Known Member
Why? What is the reason they can’t stay where they are?
I really want them to, and I would love grand avenue to become a muppets land. I just feel that if it is considered now, even if it doesn’t happen, it’s probably gonna be thrown around again. I would LOVE to be wrong though. If I could have my way, muppetvision 3.D. Would run forever.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom