ctrlaltdel
Well-Known Member
I would bet it operates a decent amount but not particularly close to max capacity. I would agree that Monster's is likely gonna draw in more than any gain in actual capacity. Which is why AC is the best place for it, you will certainly gain real capacity.There's also a TON of assumptions. Is Muppets really only half full almost all days? If it's 1,000 people an hour instead of 876, now it's 3 million. Do any attractions run at that max capacity? If it's average is 1,500, Now it's 2 million people. That also assumes no downtime. Lets assume 1 hour of downtime a day. Now we are getting closer to 1.6 million. BUT, there are also going to be days where it's way fuller in the parks, and therefore Muppets has more of a crowd. Point being, the additional is going to be WAY less that 3.6 million people. And that all is without factoring in VQ.
I really think this is the wrong way of looking at it. AC is a pretty big dead zone in the park. Actually addressing that dead zone is important and more efficient than just expanding for the heck of it.This is the BIG LIE. This is not an expansion, this is as been said here is a "re theme" of existing theme park space.
If they worked on land that was never used before, THAT is an expansion.
Yes, folks will argue the new attractions (if they are working) may absorb more guests and thereby be an increase in park capacity.
I guess we will find out in 6 to 8 years....
Can you imagine what LL costs 8 years from now, LOL, LOL