Drew the Disney Dude
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
The potential with it is insane.I'm so excited about this ride you have no idea.
The potential with it is insane.I'm so excited about this ride you have no idea.
It makes Universal a lot of money, and more than ever on the property that already did.But universal is literally giving Disney money & free advertising by keeping it. lol. It makes even less sense for them to keep super hero island in the long term when it isn't their own property. (I.E - Simpsons going away.) I understand it is under different circumstances than simpsons land. But even if they have the rights in perpetuity. Why would they continue to advertise disney properties in their parks. When instead they could use the space for their own IP.
Or WB or Sony properties.They don't care if they wholly own the IP and never have. Look at the Nintendo presence in their parks, for instance.
Universals Marvels theme park land is outdated, and quite frankly cheap looking. I wouldn’t say it compares to anything Disney has done.It makes Universal a lot of money, and more than ever on the property that already did.
Makes perfect sense to keep it.
By the time Universal sees fit to give it up, it won't be worth theme park lands.
Universal's Marvel take wound up more timeless and encompassing than anything Disney has done yet.
Nothing of their own IP right now would do as well as MSHI.
It features all time greats in IP and theme park design.
You do realize that most of Islands of Adventure is properties that Universal doesn’t own, right? That two of the lands at Epic Universe aren’t owned by Universal? That they intend for Wizarding World and Nintendo to be in all three Universal Orlando Resort theme parks?But universal is literally giving Disney money & free advertising by keeping it. lol. It makes even less sense for them to keep super hero island in the long term when it isn't their own property. (I.E - Simpsons going away.) I understand it is under different circumstances than simpsons land. But even if they have the rights in perpetuity. Why would they continue to advertise disney properties in their parks. When instead they could use the space for their own IP.
They don't care if they wholly own the IP and never have. Look at the Nintendo presence in their parks, for instance.
It is a great balance of a land, comic book and thrill, like or not.Universals Marvels theme park land is outdated, and quite frankly cheap looking. I wouldn’t say it compares to anything Disney has done.
Now, Spider-Man is a great ride and would agree that Disney so far has not done a great job with the Marvel Properties at DL
Hulk is a fine coaster. Thematically it’s nothing special though.
Totally agree. Universal has no reason to give it up. I hope that section. Of IOA gets a facade overhaul though. It is getting a little worn down and long in the tooth for me.It is a great balance of a land, comic book and thrill, like or not.
Which has come full circle now that we look past what the MCU phases and Disney even hits with Xmen 97 and other ventures.
It is all still better than anything Disney has done with the property.
It is not going anywhere soon.
A refresh is always good, but with animated hits from Sony with Spiderverse and Disney Plus's Xmen 97 being the most watched Marvel series ever produced, and that expanding, don't count on it.Totally agree. Universal has no reason to give it up. I hope that section. Of IOA gets a facade overhaul though. It is getting a little worn down and long in the tooth for me
I’ll take Tomorrowland, but you enjoy!A refresh is always good, but with animated hits from Sony with Spiderverse and Disney Plus's Xmen 97 being the most watched Marvel series ever produced, and that expanding, don't count on it.
It is IOA's Tomorrowland.
Isn't all this replacement and retheme what Disney fans moan about with WDW? "Don't replace, add!!"Simpsons and Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit going away for Pokemon and a new themed coaster where Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit for USF. There also rumors of a Ghostbusters special effects show in USF with a possibility of a Fast & Furious: Superchanged replacement coming in that park also. There also is Zelda land replacing Lost Continent in IOA sometime in the 2025 to 2035 time range.
The only way Universal removes Marvel is if they get a killer app-tier IP that can easily replace it.
Pokémon would be that IP but that's reportedly going to Simpsons.
Honestly, if you are a fan of EPCOT or DHS, please pray Disney is never allowed to use Marvel in Florida. I see things going south for those two parks if the floodgates open.
Universal has no choice for replacing Simpsons due to contract ending.Isn't all this replacement and retheme what Disney fans moan about with WDW? "Don't replace, add!!"
Why isn't Uni building in the spots with nothing happening first?
Is this another way Uni is catching up to WDW?![]()
If it is going to happen this would be the optimal time with active negotiations right now between Disney and Comcast over Hulu. I would not be surprised if this enters the conversation and becomes a bargaining chip. Stranger things have happened. Look at how Disney got the rights to Oswald back.Take it with a big grain of salt. I was told that Universal IS looking to move off Superhero Island. I have questioned the source in the past and the source's track record is mixed.
My big fear is muppets gets Spider-Man web slingers treatment like what happened to “it’s tough to be a bug” at dcaThe only way Universal removes Marvel is if they get a killer app-tier IP that can easily replace it.
Pokémon would be that IP but that's reportedly going to Simpsons.
Honestly, if you are a fan of EPCOT or DHS, please pray Disney is never allowed to use Marvel in Florida. I see things going south for those two parks if the floodgates open.
Isn't all this replacement and retheme what Disney fans moan about with WDW? "Don't replace, add!!"
Why isn't Uni building in the spots with nothing happening first?
Is this another way Uni is catching up to WDW?![]()
Isn't all this replacement and retheme what Disney fans moan about with WDW? "Don't replace, add!!"
Why isn't Uni building in the spots with nothing happening first?
Is this another way Uni is catching up to WDW?![]()
Why are we counting attractions or net gains like that is a bar of success? A spinner being replaced with massive attractions are not the same thing. I think doing a little critical thinking here would go along way with this topic. Capacity, scope, and quality of ride should be what we are really talking about, not ride count.Universal is not 22 square miles of property and features a smaller budget...and are still adding a entirely new theme park and resort area. Subjectively aside, the Universal Orlando resort has net gained attraction real estate in the last fifteen years as well as replaced.
And another theme park venue in Texas being built too.
So they are doing both.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.