Forget the first two pages......im lost. Where am I?For some reason the first two pages got lost - but you should still be able to get the gist of the discussion.

Forget the first two pages......im lost. Where am I?For some reason the first two pages got lost - but you should still be able to get the gist of the discussion.
I have some of that in my basement.......FOOTERS IN KANSAS!!!!!!!!!Let me begin by stating that I'm an insider. A big insider. Being such, I have big information on this, shall we call it, monorailgate. I have acquired information that I dare say will rock the WDWMAGIC world. Ladies and gentlemen, I present big, insider, recently acquired photographic evidence of the equipment secretly manufactured and readied by the WDW Corporation for a monorail expansion. Footers included.
![]()
"You're Welcome."
The LV monorail cost is very inflated. There are several reason for this. One being they had to purchase the land. I'll get into a detailed discussion about this later if you want.This was posted a while ago when the same subject came up:
My best guest is around $100 million per mile. That cost could be reduced if it is value engineered with other projects sharing that cost.These numbers that people love to spout off have nothing to do with disney world. These projects are built through busy cities on property owned by several different (in some cases competing) parties.
Truth be told no one on this forum knows the real price and if they do they are lying, delusional, or someone who is really in the know.
If it costs $100 million per mile to build, the number of projects sharing the cost does not reduce the amount it costs to build.My best guest is around $100 million per mile. That cost could be reduced if it is value engineered with other projects sharing that cost.
And lord knows that "value engineering" is always a welcome term when it comes to a project such as mass transit....If it costs $100 million per mile to build, the number of projects sharing the cost does not reduce the amount it costs to build.
The he!! with both. Give me maintenance, new rides and more shows!!!!!So what you are really saying...is...we could have MM+...or 5 miles of more MONORAIL !!! Give me the Monorail !!!
Correct. It helps, though. Could be that they are waiting to build new monorail resorts on land the route will pass through. That land is already zoned for future development.If it costs $100 million per mile to build, the number of projects sharing the cost does not reduce the amount it costs to build.
This is one of those things that needs to be put to rest in the filing cabinet labeled "facts". For a long time, George Lucas denied he wrote at least 9 Star Wars episodes. Now, it is a known fact. So, this is a Disney X Files that is very much the same type of thing.For what it's worth Peter, I have been aware for many years that at the time that Epcot was built they intended to expand the monorail and it was fairly certain that they did put in some footers for future use. I don't think that they felt that it was going to be too long before they used them. Perhaps to connect the Epcot resorts to Epcot or future expansions. But all that doesn't really matter because it is obvious that they have no intention of expanding it for may obvious reasons. Breakdowns are nightmares. Even if they don't happen often, even once will cause massive problems. So if you find them, uncover them and photograph them, it isn't going to change anything. So it is just fun to kid you about it and ask that you take all that energy and funnel it to something that could actually happen.
@PeterAlt , here's what you need.
J/k, if you can get permission to be back there, so much the better.
That didn't burst my bubble! It added fuel to it!Yes, Peter Alt, there are footers where the beam was going to run around the lagoon but until recently they have been used as bases for sculpture removed from other areas of the park. Sorry to burst your bubble but take the backstage magic tour and you can photograph them to your hearts desire and they will be acknowledged by the CM on your tour. Later on they decided to run it around FW and not run the whole center.
It doesn't really matter, the cost problem is in the upkeep not the build. When (and if) the footers exist, they were put there in a more optimistic time. A time when everyone was in awe of the highway in the sky. Now, not so much, it's old hat and people are complaining about them all the time, their always breaking down they say, even though what they consider a breakdown is that they stop on the rail waiting for clearance, just like one does when the traffic light turns red. It is, as I stated before, a nightmare if it actually does break down not just for Disney but for many passengers as well that have problems with being evacuated from high places, and they are just not economically practical. They are probably a permanent part of the landscape where they currently exist, but there just is no way that they are ever going to expand the monorail service. Nothing is really gained except an amped up PITA situation.What I want to know is - if these footers do get used eventually - will they save the company on construction costs, or would it make no difference if they had to build new footers?
My best guest is around $100 million per mile. That cost could be reduced if it is value engineered with other projects sharing that cost.
My best guest is around $100 million per mile. That cost could be reduced if it is value engineered with other projects sharing that cost.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.