flynnibus
Premium Member
And still it blethers on.
And that's kind of his motivation ... And people are happy to oblige :/
And still it blethers on.
I agree with everything you said here, but keep in mind that many of these decisions came out of Florida's corporate offices, not Burbank's.P&R development has been scaled back, and in most cases frozen, due to NextGen overruns. I'll let others reiterate what evidence is in the public domain since its Boxing Day and we have a house full.
The plenty of other things is the bare minimum or in some cases what was forced on TDO from Burbank. A few examples:
JC - six years late and needed before the canal leaked dry. No joke. The new deck a few years back was fast tracked when the neglected old deck actually rotted through.
PotC - mishmash of new effects that have major issues laid over 1973 infrastructure. Lighting that had to be shoehorned in. A damaged new boat fleet. And an audio system that's such a mix of 1973 and 2008 that numerous dead areas and mis matched speakers leave glaring audio holes and unbalanced BGM.
Splash - years of bare minimum neglect had made it a laughing stock. They had no choice to spend big or they could have potentially lost the building.
BTM - track worn and obsolete systems. The track will still need totally renewing along with most of the mountain since patching up will only do so much. See Anaheim in how to do it right. Show scenes and effects still not working.
CBR - technical success after years of neglect. Again close to loosing the attraction.
Diamond Horseshoe - the what? Oh. The seasonal QS building?
Liberty SQ Riverboat. The sole remaining moving attraction on ROI. Still a tug of power between keeping it open and saving money to moor it permenantly.
Haunted Mansion - excellent refurb, now with flawed Fastpass and queue layout and unnessecary, failing extra queue interactions.
Hall of Presidents - excellent refurb. Exterior was so neglected it partially collapsed during the refurb.
Small World - tangled toilets path routing now brings the traffic pinch point solely to the small world / pan corner. Worse traffic management area in the park.
Peter Pans Flight - still waiting for the 1992 DLP enhanced visuals let alone the newer - and newer still planned - Anaheim overhaul.
Snow Whites Scary Adventures - really.
FLE - not my call. Personally a fantastically themed area with two new good D tickets and a nice restraunt that the park dearly needed. Mermaid ride has multiple issues discussed elsewhere. I'll mention the cheaper electrical as opposed to mechanical ride system rotation device that malfunctions far too regularly.
Storybook Circus - not my call. Nor my thing so I'd be biased.
Space Mountain - discussed to death elsewhere. Budget slashed to bare minimum overhaul. Asbestos removal and skyway demolition also lumped into ride refurb budget to reduce available money even further. Track now in a real sorry state and asthetic overhaul - of what was possible with any remaining money - was a bandaid fix.
Tomorrowland stage - pushed through via entertainment not ops. Guest area lost to staff parking. New stage not WDI certified nor designed. Sound and light bleed into surrounding land theme.
Buzz Lightyear - where's the new guns? Still on hold?
Peoplemover - bare minimum. Damaged RVs. Failing drive system and PA. Theming actually less that before.
Carousel of Progress - bare minimum maintainence.
Tomorrowland Terrace - even when Cosmic Rays is a dozen or more people deep at each register - as you expect it to be at meal times during anything but the quietest times of year - remains closed. It used to be open year round when the park had less guests annually. For example.
Spectro - 'Nuff said.
MSEP - so worn and patched up there's a good chance it will not stand up to being shipped anywhere again.
Magic Memories and You / Celebrate the Magic - infrastructure installed to boost photopass sales. Failed so much that Disneyland photos were also used, taken that day and sent via the web. Budget to move Main Street projectors to inside buildings frozen so any moving around the roof or underneath the roof area during a show shakes the projection housings.
Wishes - reduced budget. The order from above was cut the number of shells used, or shorten the show.
This is purely off the top of my head in the park that's received the most love and charges the most (and constantly rising) admission price. We could talk about Epcot or DHS where the real problems are.
I'll mention Sorcerers as a diversionary C ticket equivalent. So I'm being fair. I won't mention A Pirates Adventure since those who work it have declared it rather less than successful.
So much for being brief. Oops..
MM+ is rooted in basic technology upgrades that have been needed for years. Even if they didn't spend the more than 2 billion on it that they are spending, at minimum, at least 1 billion in tech upgrades was needed to begin with anyway. No one should have a problem with that first billion spent. As far as transportation upgrades, well, I'm with you all the way, just wish it was more than automated monorail trains coming.MM+ is not the issue. The issue is that MM+ represents a Disney that believe in blue ocean strategy instead of growth and improved experiences. If MM+ was coming alongside transportation infrastructure and new attractions most of us wouldn't have an issue with it.
MM+ is rooted in basic technology upgrades that have been needed for years. Even if they didn't spend the more than 2 billion on it that they are spending, at minimum, at least 1 billion in tech upgrades was needed to begin with anyway. No one should have a problem with that first billion spent. As far as transportation upgrades, well, I'm with you all the way, just wish it was more than automated monorail trains coming.
As far as blue ocean strategy is concerned... there's nothing wrong with using blue ocean for a couple years to get everything running at its full potential. I just worry that they will try and sick with blue ocean for the long term... which would be a mistake.
There's really no argument to be made against that list as far as I can see but no doubt he will try, in the process accusing you of being some sort of Universal fan-boy who is intoxicated by butterbeer and taking a pointless, irrelevant cheap shot against the competition whilst providing nothing of any substance to refute your points.
Someone should take @marni1971 's post, break it up into chunks, with pictures, use #DisneySide and post it to twitter.
I see nothing wrong with his list.....surprised? I tell it like it is too ya know. He forgot many new additions though which was the main argument overall
Oh, it was marketed to the big boys in Burbank that way... that they could spin the infrastructure upgrade as a way to increase guest spending if they spent a little more on it. (Which by the way, is accurate, the system will increase what the average guest will spend... ) The problem like you said is that the public won't buy it unless it is flawless... and it is certainly not flawless.Yeah, I think you and are largely agreeing. If a $1B technology upgrad was needed, fine. But you can't sell that to the public as your new attraction -- it is just a cost of business that needs to be sucked up. But TDO views it as the next great thing instead of what it actually is -- a necessary infrastructure upgrade. That's crazy!
I'm not too knowledgeable regarding Twitter, but... that's an idea?
I mean, could advertising a Twitter tag blow up in Disney's face that easily?
So you choose to ignore people that are pro-Disney or who don't agree with everything you say?
I see nothing wrong with his list.....surprised? I tell it like it is too ya know. He forgot many new additions though which was the main argument overall
so I don't want the best for Disney?
I accept the way the company is run...it is a business and they are making money...lots of money.... that doesn't mean I think they should/could do a lot better in the Orlando parks
Many of the problems WDW is facing are created by WDW itself. Everyone would love to blame corporate in California for every little detail, but the truth is, the concept of MyMagic+ is solid. It's the execution of the program that was badly done, mainly the fault of WDW's own incompetent management team. (And to an extent, WDI) I'm all for blaming, but let's blame the right group of people.
Yes and no.I agree with everything you said here, but keep in mind that many of these decisions came out of Florida's corporate offices, not Burbank's.
That's the difference - Many of us do not accept the way the company is run. We still expect Disney to meet the standards which it set for itself many years ago. When it doesn't, it shouldn't come as a surprise we're so critical.
You may not think they can do better in Orlando, but the legacy Disney is coasting on today was built at a time when they indeed did so much better. It was a business back then, too.
Responsible, yes. But the guys who are screwing everything up? They're all in Florida. You're talking about budgets. I'm talking about decisions. Two different apples my friend.Yes and no.
You have to consider how budgets are done at large corporations. They are driven top-down and segments have to make do with what they are given while still satisfying EBIT targets.
Budgets are squeezed while revenue & profit targets are increased.
Ultimately, everything comes from corporate headquarters.
Ultimately, Burbank is responsible what for happens in Orlando.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.