Skippy's Pal
Well-Known Member
riiiiiight......
Via InsideTheMagic:
This is really lame spin. #LimitedTimeSexy
Agreed. Perhaps the person who wrote this moonlights at the Cincinnati office of the IRS.
riiiiiight......
Via InsideTheMagic:
This is really lame spin. #LimitedTimeSexy
From a product design perspective, the princesses have to have the same figure because they're all made out of the same molds.I think it looks more sexualized because she looks older. And her dress wasn't cut that low in the original. Also the ratio of her bust to waist to hips wasn't as hourglass. And her lips are wider, she looks like she has heavy makeup on...
From a product design perspective, the princesses have to have the same figure because they're all made out of the same molds.
Changing the look of the meet and greet characters? Who notices this stuff? There's always going to be some translation. A face character will never look exactly like hand drawn animation, which will never match computer animation, which will never match a Barbie doll, which will never match a stuffed plush. There's no way to make a human being look exactly like the animated Cinderella. Just ain't gonna happen.It's all about the character's integrity to me. sure there are gray areas but for the most part, the most important part of a character is what we know about them. Especially for characters as long running as Snow White, Cinderella, and Sleeping Beauty. When Disney changes the characters, it waters them down and takes a piece of their spirit away.
Sure it's ok to advertise a certain look for a 'limited time,' I often mention how I liked the gold look the princesses took a few years ago. But that went away. It wasn't a permanent fixture. These new looks are 'for good' from what I understand. Proven by the fact that they actually changed their long standing meet and greet characters to these horrid looks.
Ugh, I have so much to say on this topic. you don't know how bad I keep changing my posts to try and cut them down. I just need to start a blog or something, lol
They're animated in different aesthetics. It's like a Vinlymation. If you're trying to fit an Eeyore into a Vinylmation, you're going to have to do something about the ears, head, and body shapes.I hate merchandising sometimes. If that is the case, why don't they just design the characters to originally fit the molds? Why bother making an original unique character if all they are going to do is change her?
I hate merchandising sometimes. If that is the case, why don't they just design the characters to originally fit the molds? Why bother making an original unique character if all they are going to do is change her?
I think it looks more sexualized because she looks older. And her dress wasn't cut that low in the original. Also the ratio of her bust to waist to hips wasn't as hourglass. And her lips are wider, she looks like she has heavy makeup on...
The LAST thing you want is the marketing department designing characters.
.....Exactly. Merida is a very young 16 where as Aurora is a very mature 16 in both beauty and manners. To try and conform Merida to that just doesn't work. Making her older feels very forced to me. This is the same girl who comes running through the palace halls with an apple in her mouth. Now she is poised and bedazzled. She is probably hating every single moment of it. As for the curves, looks like her mom put a little extra effort in that corset. Poor girl.
Um. Yes. It is.They already are. It's called "Princess Redesigns"
It's going very well amongst the fans....
Changing the look of the meet and greet characters? Who notices this stuff? There's always going to be some translation. A face character will never look exactly like hand drawn animation, which will never match computer animation, which will never match a Barbie doll, which will never match a stuffed plush. There's no way to make a human being look exactly like the animated Cinderella. Just ain't gonna happen.
I could be wrong, correct me if I am ...bit this article is dated 2012 with the statistics from 2011 which were before the redesigns...no?
(Off topic: Thanks for having an honest disagreement and staying civil, unlike my friends in some of this evening's more heated threads.)I notice that stuff. And so do a lot of other people.
No it's not going to happen, and most people understand that, including me. However, there is a difference between trying to make them look as close as possible and completely altering their entire look. Cinderella with side swept bangs looking like some prom reject and flattening Aurora's hair taking away what little character she had left is not my idea of capturing their look.
It's the most recent info I had with a quick search but my main point wasn't "the redesigns are good" but that "marketing and consumer products know what they're doing."I could be wrong, correct me if I am ...bit this article is dated 2012 with the statistics from 2011 which were before the redesigns...no?
WHAT???!!!!! Nuh-uh!!!!!!!!.....
You know shes, like... fictional, right?
Furrealz.WHAT???!!!!! Nuh-uh!!!!!!!!
(Off topic: Thanks for having an honest disagreement and staying civil, unlike my friends in some of this evening's more heated threads.)
My honest opinion of your post, from a strictly business perspective, is that the ONLY people who notice the things that you notice are the top 0.01% of Disney fanatics. This forum is what, 0.1% of WDW guests? Probably less. Of us, I bet you're among roughly 10% who ever noticed that Cinderella now has "side swept bangs." I don't even know what that means. Frankly, there's no reason for them to try to please you to that level of detail because folks who love Disney enough to notice those things are people who are going to continue to follow and support the brand regardless. If it's easier/cheaper/more marketable to change some features to please the masses, they'll make that trade every time, even if they have to step on the toes of the most hardcore. The most hardcore will always be loyal.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.