I hope I don’t regret jumping into this thread but I do loves me some philosophical questions.
“Inclusivity” is a vague term, like “freedom”. We obviously can’t have absolute inclusivity because it would mean embracing everyone from fascists to violent sociopaths. I mean I guess we could do that, but then a totalitarian type would just take over and create a totally un-inclusive society. When we say inclusivity, it’s about making a particular circle bigger but still with boundaries where people are excluded. In the paradigm we’re discussing here, older more conservative views are the excluded. This paradigm is most decidedly not more inclusive to them. You will sometimes hear people complain that this means we have diversity of more superficial characteristics like what one is wearing, but not “diversity of viewpoints”.
My personal point of view - I am old enough (mid 40s) that at a visceral level, cis men in women’s dresses strikes me as esoteric (transgender men wouldn’t strike me as unusual.) Akin to, I don’t know, cast members wearing giant inflatable flamingo hats or something. However, I feel that it would be hypocritical of me not to support cast members wearing whatever costume they want - so I feel it’s “on me”, in this case, to realize I just grew up in a different time and work on getting over my reaction. That said… I also have a hard time thinking we should demonize some sweet grey haired grandma and grandpa from the midwest as bigots because they think a man in a dress at the Magic Kingdom - the epitome of squeaky clean all American life - is shocking. I think at some point you give people some grace and say, hey, they were just raised in a totally different time, change isn’t easy, let’s not demand that a 60 or 70 something who can’t adjust to radically altered social norms at the drop of a hat is some kind of hateful xenophobe. They were enculturated for decades with certain norms, I think change being difficult and often anxiety-producing when the world suddenly looks very different is natural.