jt04
Well-Known Member
Not to harp on the same thing, but I'm just trying to understand, you avoid a thread because you don't comment on experts or analysts conjecture.
But you posted in this thread, which is a thread about forecasting attendance figures at MK, which is....."conjecture?". They could break attendance records or they could not.
Do you agree with Disney's own analysts and experts conjecture and disagree with outside experts and analysts conjecture?
Technically speaking, experts and analysts forecasting is not "conjecture," as conjecture is making suppositions based on presumptions and guesswork. Experts and analysts, good ones anyway, devote hours upon hours of research when making their forecasts. They do make some presumptions and guesses, but they are only made in the context of extrapolating trends, survey research, consensus methods, simulations, etc., etc., etc.
Do you believe Disney's own attendance forecasting methods are purely presumptions, guesswork, and "conjecture?" Or do you just believe the outside analysts and experts methods are purely conjecture?
You are astoundingly confusing in your posts.
Steve posted this thread and I trust him. He has never claimed to be an analyst and I believe his judgement is sound.
I don't have a problems with analysts per se, I have just found that there are intuitive aspects to projecting trends that are usually ignored by numbers crunchers. How many stories on the news start out with the phrase, "Experts (or analysts) were suprised when..........."? :brick:
There is also a horrible trend where people fit the data to conform to a pre-determined outcome. Ths is dangerous and is becoming way to common. Truth can't be subjective by it's very definition. Hence people can say with a straight face things like, "it's colder this winter because of global warming". :lookaroun
Now, where did I leave my critical thinking skills?