“Gritty totally fits because he’s a party animal.”New D23 rumour will address this gritty question once and for all with a new character meet and greet:
View attachment 805199
“Gritty totally fits because he’s a party animal.”New D23 rumour will address this gritty question once and for all with a new character meet and greet:
View attachment 805199
You want a Disney IP party animal, like Slurms McKenzie...“Gritty totally fits because he’s a party animal.”
Sadly, I am too old to get this reference. Just seeing a turd in an aqua leisure shirt.
More so if it had a new storyline. Shame it would replace an existing attraction though.Its really not that hard to tie Indiana Jones into Animal Kingdom.
I celebrate our personal preferences and ideas. But we can’t dismiss 1 of 4 opening day lands, or one of the only opening day attractions, to make a point that a film retelling ride with animatronic animals is a rewrite of AK’s themes. Cute animals have always been there. The rewrite would be to impose new rules about film retellings and gritty realism that have never been there.I'm going to leave Camp Minnie Mickey out of it because honestly, I seriously doubt anyone in this thread is dreaming of theming all of AK to a Camp Minnie Mickey esque experience. Maybe that shows that AK was not 100% consistent, as is the case with all things and all people - but is anyone going - "Yes! We found an opening! Camp Minnie Mickey should be the inspiration moving forward!" I kinda doubt it.
I think Festival of the Lion King has been well regarded and maybe shows that classic IP motifs can be incorporated in small doses in specific places while maintaining the original vision of AK. I think you and I both know that a LK flume ride is not going to be any Festival of the Lion King though, unless I am greatly surprised. And maybe I'll be greatly surprised!
I celebrate our personal preferences and ideas. But we can’t dismiss 1 of 4 opening day lands, or one of the only opening day attractions, to make a point that a film retelling ride with animatronic animals is a rewrite of AK’s themes. Cute animals have always been there. The rewrite would be to impose new rules about film retellings and gritty realism that have never been there.
And even less so today when we have a Finding Nemo show that also has cartoon animals (in a film retelling), cartoon insects putting on a variety show, and even more character meet and greets
We also can’t argue absence is proof. The park didn’t open with roller coasters, so would we say Everest was a rewrite? The park didn’t open with an IP land so is Avatar a rewrite? A film retelling ride is no different from these in that it shares some characteristics with the park, and deviates in others.
This is ignoring so much context.I celebrate our personal preferences and ideas. But we can’t dismiss 1 of 4 opening day lands, or one of the only opening day attractions, to make a point that a film retelling ride with animatronic animals is a rewrite of AK’s themes. Cute animals have always been there. The rewrite would be to impose new rules about film retellings and gritty realism that have never been there.
And even less so today when we have a Finding Nemo show that also has cartoon animals (in a film retelling), cartoon insects putting on a variety show, and even more character meet and greets
We also can’t argue absence is proof. The park didn’t open with roller coasters, so would we say Everest was a rewrite? The park didn’t open with an IP land so is Avatar a rewrite? A film retelling ride is no different from these in that it shares some characteristics with the park, and deviates in others.
“Animal Kingdom has always been the park about all animals — real and fictional, gritty and cartoon, and of past, present, and myth” doesn’t require all that hyperbole that nobody is actually trying to sayOk, sure.
Animal Kingdom has always been the cute, IP based, fantasy themed park.
I welcome a kawaii overlay, in keeping with the original theme of the park. I hope they have some really good popcorn buckets.
I don't often see mentioned on here that the basis to Africa, Asia, Pandora and Dinoland is all tourism. You are visiting these lands on the premise that you are a tourist on holiday.Even if you buy that excuse for what is ultimately a jarring visual misfit for the park, it doesn’t explain the lack of any meaningful theme or message or education or connection to animals from a content perspective
CMM was a last minute cheap and temporary fix as Beastly Kingdom was cut none of the parks values applied to that land. The same applied to FOTLK however as I said above its story treatment in Harambe works well.Camp Minnie Mickey and the character meet ups weren’t gritty realism. Festival of the Lion King itself has animatronic cartoon animals being presented to us as actual animals - they’re not masks. The park has ever adhered to this gritty realism requirement from the day it opened. It’s always had cartoon animals
So if we're touristing in Harambe, we can't have ventured into a corner of the Savannah where lions are in the middle of a (familiar) succession struggle? I don't see how bold changes to the film are necessary, even if you believe tourism is the theme of the park. These animals live in Africa, we're on vacay in Africa, we see them while on a boat...Therefore for a Lion King boat ride to 'fit' it seems like a push to apply the above principles unless they doing a very bold story treatment for the ride which is where I think a lot of people are trying to express their concerns around it's fit in the park.
Wimmy-wam-wam-wozzle!
(and preferably movies of assets bought or produced under Bob).l
I’m not sure I’d characterize the tourism angle as a principle of the park. It’s a framing devise. It’s the park’s equivalent of “recruits” but one that doesn’t require hollow on-the-nose statements as we are in facts tourists.I don't often see mentioned on here that the basis to Africa, Asia, Pandora and Dinoland is all tourism. You are visiting these lands on the premise that you are a tourist on holiday.
Africa - safari excursion
Asia - water rafting excursion, mountain/yeti train excursion
Pandora - boat tour, banshee flight
Dinoland - dinosaur safari, roadside carnival
Within these lands the supporting attractions/restaurants are set up to support the tourist economic activity of tourism in each land. FOTLK is a performance in a venue in Harambe, Maharaja Jungle Trek is exploring historic ruins, Chester and Hesters is profiteering off the Dino Institute.
Therefore for a Lion King boat ride to 'fit' it seems like a push to apply the above principles unless they doing a very bold story treatment for the ride which is where I think a lot of people are trying to express their concerns around it's fit in the park. To be fair they went completely left field for Tianna's so it could be possible.
His middle name is “damn man”
Preferably does not mean exclusively.
Did you miss the word "preferably"?
Apologies if I was a bit short. Theme parks have lots and lots of elements. If your criteria is “this appeared somewhere in the park at one point in time”, the theme could literally be anything and becomes a meaningless construct. I could go on and on about how Magic Kingdom has always contained lots of food and merch and so really we should turn the place into Disney Springs. Or a coaster park. Or a Renaissance Fair. Whatever. Lots of stuff has appeared in that park.“Animal Kingdom has always been the park about all animals — real and fictional, gritty and cartoon, and of past, present, and myth” doesn’t require all that hyperbole that nobody is actually trying to say
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.