We can always make DAK one giant omnimover ride (with each RV looking like a mini safari jeep) and all the animals are AAs doing their usual animal things.
There. Done.
There. Done.
I miss Tarzan Rocksadded one
Plot twist… the animals sell you $8 cupcakes and exclusive Loungefly backpacks while talking about how great DVC is.We can always make DAK one giant omnimover ride (with each RV looking like a mini safari jeep) and all the animals are AAs doing their usual animal things.
There. Done.
Plot twist… the animals sell you $8 cupcakes and exclusive Loungefly backpacks while talking about how great DVC is.Sorry, sorry, couldn’t help myself. Back to pixie dusting.
Please tell us who said the IP doesn’t fit in the park. The reason this discussion persists way beyond its sell-by date is apparently because no one has basic reading comprehension skills.If the Lion King, an IP thats animal themed, doesnt fit in a theme park centered around animals, then how does Avatar, an IP centered around a fictional world, fit.
Says one who keeps arguingPlease tell us who said the IP doesn’t fit in the park. The reason this discussion persists way beyond its sell-by date is apparently because no one has basic reading comprehension skills.
When people misrepresent what was said, I will respond. Sorry.Says one who keeps arguing
I just want a well designed ride that is entertaining
Please tell us who said the IP doesn’t fit in the park. The reason this discussion persists way beyond its sell-by date is apparently because no one has basic reading comprehension skills.
What was said was that, if a new Lion King attraction is built, some would prefer it not be a book report ride but rather something that better exemplifies the park's themes. That could still be a Lion King attraction, just in a different format. No one is complaining that multiple instances of The Lion King already exist in the park, for instance.I dunno, there was an argument over what fits in Animal Kingdom between Lion King, Jungle Book and Indiana Jones. Maybe you should go back and re-read some of the earlier posts debating it instead of getting upset over it.
Or, alternately, some of us are not opposed to a re-writing of the park's themes, if well done. To say that cute singing cartoon lions are a natural fit for the current theme - which was explicitly described as gritty realism in the early days, in order to highlight the need for conservation - is just a logical bridge too far in terms of logical continuity.What was said was that, if a new Lion King attraction is built, some would prefer it not be a book report ride but rather something that better exemplifies the park's themes. That could still be a Lion King attraction, just in a different format. No one is complaining that multiple instances of The Lion King already exist in the park, for instance.
So you're going to build an audio-animatronic in the middle of the road so that the ride vehicle can't move forward?We can always make DAK one giant omnimover ride (with each RV looking like a mini safari jeep) and all the animals are AAs doing their usual animal things.
There. Done.
Chester and Hester’s is still a thing and has been a thing for a dang long time. That is everything BUT gritty or realism. Other than maybe the Fortnite dance of the same namewhich was explicitly described as gritty realism in the early days
Chester and Hester’s is supposed to be a realistic roadside attraction type place, if I understand correctly. As opposed to something out of, say, Fantasyland. But very much based in reality, not an animated or idealized world.Chester and Hester’s is still a thing and has been a thing for a dang long time. That is everything BUT gritty or realism. Other than maybe the Fortnite dance of the same name
Chester and Hester’s is still a thing and has been a thing for a dang long time. That is everything BUT gritty or realism. Other than maybe the Fortnite dance of the same name
Even if you buy that excuse for what is ultimately a jarring visual misfit for the park, it doesn’t explain the lack of any meaningful theme or message or education or connection to animals from a content perspectiveChester and Hester’s is supposed to be a realistic roadside attraction type place, if I understand correctly. As opposed to something out of, say, Fantasyland. But very much based in reality, not an animated or idealized world.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.