ppete1975
Well-Known Member
unless it becomes a big choke point.... but im holding back comments for nowTo be fair, I'm just excited to be able to cut through the middle of the park again once it opens.
unless it becomes a big choke point.... but im holding back comments for nowTo be fair, I'm just excited to be able to cut through the middle of the park again once it opens.
Pre-pandemic, it was going to be 2023. Seems like that hasn't changed, except, missing one giant festival building.So at this rate, what are we thinking, they should maybe have this wrapped up early 2052!?
My lord Universal had that velociraptor coaster from inception to completion in the amount time it took to rip down one of the innovention walls.
I am confident there will still be a giant festival building. Just not the one in the concept art. Daddy Chapbucks isn’t that rich anymore.Pre-pandemic, it was going to be 2023. Seems like that hasn't changed, except, missing one giant festival building.
I am confident there will still be a giant festival building. Just not the one in the concept art. Daddy Chapbucks isn’t that rich anymore.
Agree with you but once completed maybe ill change my mind but i feel like they are making something similar to Navi river journey and avatar in Epcot. Imagination needs to be redone, the horizons building in dark (they were using it for F&W for a while but that stopped) and you have a ride in there that could be resurected as something. The rendition looks nice but as they always say not sure the juice is worth the squeeze on this project. Like i said i could be 1000% wrong when its done.Still interested to see what this shapes up to be when all is said and done.
I agree with other posters that the EPCOT renovations seems muddled at best. Why spend all this money on the central hub and yet leave Imagination in its current state? At this point Imagination, Gran Fiesta Tour, and Nemo should be the focus. Imagine if they spent this money on a new Figment E-ticket worth of the building, went through with the Coco overlay to Mexico (although it would need a bigger footprint somehow), and did something more inspired with the Seas pavillion (Nemo). Then you'd have three "new" attractions to excite guests. Sigh.....
I do agree that they're TRYING to improve the experience -- in a lot of ways. However, people have been complaining about the cheapening of Figment some 20-odd years ago for about that long. It needed to be FIXED not half the ride ripped out.I have been a life long Disney fan, but one thing is for sure.... the people who plan and design these attractions aren't trying to cheapen the experience, they are trying to better it, in new and exciting ways. you guys care for the past too much, they've got rid or some well old innovations buildings, rarely used, and some shop fronts and a fountain. To try to add to the experience , you all keep going on about the imagination pavilion like they ruined Figment yesterday, no they changed him 20 odd years ago, and it isn't that bad if you don't just hold on to the past too much. All these people working at Disney have more talent, expertise and degrees relevant to this than any body else in theirs fields, enjoy the changes, stop complaining. That quality will win out.
If they’re so great why did they need someone else to design the centerpiece they’ve since likely scrapped?I have been a life long Disney fan, but one thing is for sure.... the people who plan and design these attractions aren't trying to cheapen the experience, they are trying to better it, in new and exciting ways. you guys care for the past too much, they've got rid or some well old innovations buildings, rarely used, and some shop fronts and a fountain. To try to add to the experience , you all keep going on about the imagination pavilion like they ruined Figment yesterday, no they changed him 20 odd years ago, and it isn't that bad if you don't just hold on to the past too much. All these people working at Disney have more talent, expertise and degrees relevant to this than any body else in theirs fields, enjoy the changes, stop complaining. That quality will win out.
Imagination is a really bad ride because it’s a really bad ride. Now, if you remember what it replaced, it’s even worse, but it’s really bad on its own merits. The same is true of Mission: Space. Heck, the same is true of EPCOT as a whole.I have been a life long Disney fan, but one thing is for sure.... the people who plan and design these attractions aren't trying to cheapen the experience, they are trying to better it, in new and exciting ways. you guys care for the past too much, they've got rid or some well old innovations buildings, rarely used, and some shop fronts and a fountain. To try to add to the experience , you all keep going on about the imagination pavilion like they ruined Figment yesterday, no they changed him 20 odd years ago, and it isn't that bad if you don't just hold on to the past too much. All these people working at Disney have more talent, expertise and degrees relevant to this than any body else in theirs fields, enjoy the changes, stop complaining. That quality will win out.
Imagination is a really bad ride because it’s a really bad ride. Now, if you remember what it replaced, it’s even worse, but it’s really bad on its own merits. The same is true of Mission: Space. Heck, the same is true of EPCOT as a whole.
In my opinion (and I don’t think it’s that unique) in only one case has WDW managed to replace a ride with a clearly superior ride - MMRR. That track record doesn’t inspire a great deal of faith in the abilities of modern management and Imagineers.
And I don’t think one can say anymore that Disney’s creatives are the best in the business. Thirty years ago, sure. Now, Uni is at least WDWs equal.
I have been a life long Disney fan, but one thing is for sure.... the people who plan and design these attractions aren't trying to cheapen the experience, they are trying to better it, in new and exciting ways. you guys care for the past too much, they've got rid or some well old innovations buildings, rarely used, and some shop fronts and a fountain. To try to add to the experience , you all keep going on about the imagination pavilion like they ruined Figment yesterday, no they changed him 20 odd years ago, and it isn't that bad if you don't just hold on to the past too much. All these people working at Disney have more talent, expertise and degrees relevant to this than any body else in theirs fields, enjoy the changes, stop complaining. That quality will win out.
Imagination is a really bad ride because it’s a really bad ride. Now, if you remember what it replaced, it’s even worse, but it’s really bad on its own merits. The same is true of Mission: Space. Heck, the same is true of EPCOT as a whole.
In my opinion (and I don’t think it’s that unique) in only one case has WDW managed to replace a ride with a clearly superior ride - MMRR. That track record doesn’t inspire a great deal of faith in the abilities of modern management and Imagineers.
And I don’t think one can say anymore that Disney’s creatives are the best in the business. Thirty years ago, sure. Now, Uni is at least WDWs equal.
Couldn’t agree more. Figment is a terrible ride and the whole imagination building needs to refurbished. Figment is a terrible ride and I won’t even waste my time on the caption Eo replacement. Horizons used to be a fun pavilion and body wars good and as I mentioned that I’m shocked they could use that infrastructure for a new ride. They redid star tours and it’s exactly the same ride structure. I really don’t want to go back 20 years to dream flight but they to freshen up some things in Epcot. My argument was that they are spending all this money and time on this new structure but I hope they spend money on other things in Epcot as it’s my favorite park.Imagination is a really bad ride because it’s a really bad ride. Now, if you remember what it replaced, it’s even worse, but it’s really bad on its own merits. The same is true of Mission: Space. Heck, the same is true of EPCOT as a whole.
In my opinion (and I don’t think it’s that unique) in only one case has WDW managed to replace a ride with a clearly superior ride - MMRR. That track record doesn’t inspire a great deal of faith in the abilities of modern management and Imagineers.
And I don’t think one can say anymore that Disney’s creatives are the best in the business. Thirty years ago, sure. Now, Uni is at least WDWs equal.
Mission Space is excellent, 'cept for some degree of queasiness.Imagination is a really bad ride because it’s a really bad ride. Now, if you remember what it replaced, it’s even worse, but it’s really bad on its own merits. The same is true of Mission: Space. Heck, the same is true of EPCOT as a whole.
In my opinion (and I don’t think it’s that unique) in only one case has WDW managed to replace a ride with a clearly superior ride - MMRR. That track record doesn’t inspire a great deal of faith in the abilities of modern management and Imagineers.
And I don’t think one can say anymore that Disney’s creatives are the best in the business. Thirty years ago, sure. Now, Uni is at least WDWs equal.
Yeah, I wouldn’t describe M:S as a bad ride at all. In fact the intense side (orange right?) is actually pretty impressive and unique in terms of a theme park ride by recreating the feeling of actual astronaut training. Now I get that isn’t for everyone and a lot of folks can’t handle it, but it wouldn’t achieve its goal if it weren’t appropriately intense.Mission Space is excellent, 'cept for some degree of queasiness.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.