BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
What is problematic is if the quality of Disney's output constantly tracks lower than Universal's and/or the gap continues to close on the service front, which is obviously entirely possible. But as others have pointed out, in the time between the launch of the Wizarding World and Epic Universe, Walt Disney World will have tackled New Fantasyland, Pandora, Galaxy's Edge, Toy Story Land, the Future World overhaul, and a smattering of other key attractions (Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway, Ratatouille, TRON, Bayou Adventure, etc.). In other words, enough to fill a new park; no matter what you think of these additions (and the fact that they didn't do as much as they should have to increase capacity due to replacement), that's a lot.
No doubt Disney invested massive sums into their parks after Potter
It was done stupidly and poorly and didn't result in much past mediocrity, but they did dump a whole lotta $$$ into WDW once they saw what Comcast did with the WW.
Honestly, I think an obvious, direct response to Epic Universe would be more troubling to investors because it would signal that Disney is deeply worried about the competition and scrambling.
The problem isn't that Disney has no 'response' to EU. The problem is that Disney isn't proactively investing on their own to have any draws to their parks during the 2025–2027 timeframe. AND they're actively giving guests reasons not to go or come back. Mostly the latter, really. Their attendance will reflect this