But what happens when there is no one there to use G+?They’re in a pickle here. Hundreds of millions in development costs, juicy revenue stream, physical infrastructure changes to accommodate it. Reducing it to a “free” add on also diminishes its value when/ if they start charging for it again.
It is unjustifiable to charge almost 50% more than this time last year for parks that are significantly less busy. It would be even more unjustifiable if they had data showing that G+ was a contributing reason for lower attendance.