Is attendance really down at WDW this or…

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
I don’t think Disney is upset when you take a no parks vacation.
IgerNoParks.jpg
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
There are entire buildings that have been closed off for months at both Value and Moderate properties.

I've heard of earlier plans to DVC-ize portions of 2 mods, but that was decided against.

Several values are soft as well, but their layouts and DVC needs don't allow for buildings being taken offline.
That's a cost savings right there. Those buildings won't need lighting , AC and or other energy usage but if closed for long periods of time those buildings would gather exterior and interior dirt dust and mildew.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
I agree with some of what you are saying. Where I disagree is equating a Disney resort with a high end hotel in a major city. IMO Disney is not a luxury vacation spot. For the prices they charge and for what you get if you aren't going to the parks, you're much better off going somewhere else.

My wife, child and I looked at Carribean Beach resort for a stay in October but decided on Clearwater instead. A nice resort is half the price for a week with similar amenities.
It's certainly in the eye of the beholder. I think of Disney hotels as being harder to rate along the usual lines because you're paying in part for the surrounding theming and recreation. Sort of like a cruise ship, staterooms may be much more bare bones than a standard hotel but given the context of a cruise ship people view them differently.

But yeah, I will certainly say that if I was ranking most Disney resorts just on the hotel room, by itself, those are nothing to write home about. Even the DVC two bedrooms are nothing to write home about. Something like the Kimpton hotel rooms, for example, have a more luxe, trendy feel and are priced like a Disney moderate. And I think Disney has a habit of going from Point A to Point E on the luxury scale with not enough in between. Like the Polynesian Bungalows are great, but how about some "normal" hotel rooms with marble sinks and soaking tubs?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I don’t think Disney is upset when you take a no parks vacation.

It’s more or less an open secret that WDW’s hotels generate more operating income than the parks do.

And if you think of WDW as a hotel and timeshare business leveraging a theme park destination to drive hotel room and timeshare sales, a lot of their other business decisions make a lot more sense.

If your reaction to the park changes is that you’re going to go to Florida, stay in a WDW property of some sort, and not go to the parks, that’s still a win for them.

OI is not what they seek…profit is. The majority of that comes from the shops.

They should NEVER make gate entry a hindrance to crowds.

And they have.

Terrible management
 

CastAStone

5th gate? Just build a new resort Bob.
OI is not what they seek…profit is
Operating income IS the most basic form of profit, before accounting for all the shared fixed costs. It’s how you evaluate the profitability of a product / brand / division within a company.

The margins on a $900 hotel room at a hotel with basically no premium services except luggage delivery are insane. The margins on a theme park with thousands of employees per day are good but not like the hotel rooms.

The hotel division generates nearly the revenue of the theme park sales, but from what I have heard from others here and elsewhere, but delivers more OI / Profit than the parks do.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
The hotel division generates nearly the revenue of the theme park sales, but from what I have heard from others here and elsewhere, but delivers more OI / Profit than the parks do.
Is that pre or post Genie? I thought I read on these boards that Genie currently generates as much profit as the entire cruise line. 😳
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Operating income IS the most basic form of profit, before accounting for all the shared fixed costs. It’s how you evaluate the profitability of a product / brand / division within a company.

The margins on a $900 hotel room at a hotel with basically no premium services except luggage delivery are insane. The margins on a theme park with thousands of employees per day are good but not like the hotel rooms.

The hotel division generates nearly the revenue of the theme park sales, but from what I have heard from others here and elsewhere, but delivers more OI / Profit than the parks do.

My point was not that they are vastly different…it’s just the one is “pure” and that’s what the watchers like.

As far as “margins” on hotel rooms…that’s a dangerous game you can’t get out of…

There’s some ugly rumors they still have blocks offline across property? All the time.

That was NEVER done outside of a recession…and even there sparingly.

They can’t sell those rooms. Dvc conversions are a necessity…not brilliant strategy or a random occurrence
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
Not nearly as many whales in the ocean as they bet on. Their refusal to course-correct shows just how devastating it could be in the short term.
Most whales or the 1% that live in my area are highly well educated , very successful in the careers , long term market investors , some send their kids to private and or boarding schools travel the world on vacation to other places other than Disney. This is during the Eisner and Iger eras.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
Most whales or the 1% that live in my area are highly well educated , very successful in the careers , long term market investors , some send their kids to private and or boarding schools travel the world on vacation to other places other than Disney. This is during the Eisner and Iger eras.
It's why it makes no sense to market to them. Their bread and butter is the middle class. Disney is not a luxury vacation no matter how much they and fans want to believe it is.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
It's why it makes no sense to market to them. Their bread and butter is the middle class. Disney is not a luxury vacation no matter how much they and fans want to believe it is.

The scarcity of the product was, over time, always going to squeeze out more of the middle class that could normally afford it. That's what happens with a luxury product, and to a degree, what makes it a luxury product.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
That logic fails cause the people that can afford it have no interest in Disney or theme parks.

No you've missed the bigger point: the middle class will (generally) keep growing and expanding to the point that the parks can only serve a smaller and smaller percentage of it. At that point it becomes more and more of a luxury.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
The issue happened when lots of middle class people flourished with exploding home values, low interest rates, and lots of access to credit. Disney saw a trend, reacted accordingly, and foolishly thought it would last forever.

And Disney parks were cheap and easily accessible for a long time. That's why MK went from 10M a year to 20M a year. THAT was unsustainable for a number of reasons.

They're price correcting right now. They're making the parks generally more expensive and harder to access because cramming more and more people down Main Street is not the answer.

If they can convert some people/families from going once a year to once every three or five years, they will be far better off.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom