Indiana Jones Adventure refurbishment

Rich T

Well-Known Member
I think it’s a unique ride. They did a very good job of incorporating screens with changing physical sets.
Agree. I just think it has some issues and could be improved. It will be interesting to see if the potential for changing up the scenes/reprogramming the vehicles is put to use in the future.
 

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
Don’t forget Dog-Kickin’ Minnie!
M&M are awful in this. She not only accidentally kicks him, but accidentally locks him in the trunk (where he'd probably have died). Fortunately they apparently cannot afford a decent car and a bump in the road opens the latch and sends stuff flying. Then they hit a switch causing a train to derail. And finally, in the end, just pretend nothing happened at all. :D <Meanwhile poor Pluto is trying to get that darn picnic basket. Thats a loyal dog)
 

Parteecia

Well-Known Member

The Indiana Jones Adventure dark ride in the crumbling Temple of the Forbidden Eye at Disneyland that has been prone to downtime and showing its age in recent years will undergo a comprehensive refurbishment in early 2023.

The Indiana Jones Adventure attraction will be closed from Jan. 9 until spring 2023 for refurbishment and maintenance, according to the Disneyland website.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
M&M are awful in this. She not only accidentally kicks him, but accidentally locks him in the trunk (where he'd probably have died). Fortunately they apparently cannot afford a decent car and a bump in the road opens the latch and sends stuff flying. Then they hit a switch causing a train to derail. And finally, in the end, just pretend nothing happened at all. :D <Meanwhile poor Pluto is trying to get that darn picnic basket. Thats a loyal dog)
That is tame compared to what happens in a Loony Tunes cartoon.
 

GiveMeTheMusic

Well-Known Member
Indy and RSR are both getting budget-heavy refurbs, and should be in top shape again once those are complete. Spider-Man's refurb has been delayed to accommodate RSR closing January 17.

Not happy that small world is going down first after Xmas, leaving HMH going until later in Jan.

And wow, sure looks like Lincoln is closing for a long time too! Wonder what's up with Abe?
 

PiratesMansion

Well-Known Member
At least it seems like we're finally getting back to proper refurbs. While maybe exaggerating a bit to say no refurb work happened post-reopening, it certainly felt like it at times.

Nature is healing.

RE Lincoln refurb: maybe a minority opinion, but I love "Two Brothers" and especially "Golden Dreams" and hope they stay. It doesn't bother me that they're repeats from Epcot. I also hope they don't mess with Lincoln's actual speech too much-they did their job when they chose it years ago. The speech still resonates IMO.
 

SuddenStorm

Well-Known Member
As long as everything that is still there from '64 remains, and that any changes are minimal and enhance the show instead of distract and detract it's fine.

Getting rid of the Two Brothers bit would be fine- I don't hate it but it doesn't help the pacing of the show.
 

SuddenStorm

Well-Known Member
A few more observations-

Baxter was involved with the current iteration of the show, so this is another Baxter project potentially getting altered. Every year his legacy in the park is lessened.

Why does WDI insist on changing things that work, when there's the Star Wars Launch Bay, Galaxy's Edge, Avenger's Campus, etc. that all need work?

Very few changes in the last 5-10 years can be unanimously praised as positives. It'd be nice if they'd let the park breathe for a bit and just fix up what's there currently.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
A few more observations-

Baxter was involved with the current iteration of the show, so this is another Baxter project potentially getting altered. Every year his legacy in the park is lessened.

Why does WDI insist on changing things that work, when there's the Star Wars Launch Bay, Galaxy's Edge, Avenger's Campus, etc. that all need work?

Very few changes in the last 5-10 years can be unanimously praised as positives. It'd be nice if they'd let the park breathe for a bit and just fix up what's there currently.
It is Imagineer graffiti.

It is like saying "I contributed to Disneyland by changing existing attractions slightly instead of coming up with something original on my own. "
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
Why does WDI insist on changing things that work

Because they actually, objectively, do not work?

I appreciate the Lincoln show being there from a historical perspective, but what is the point of running an attraction that is far less than half full at every showing?
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Because they actually, objectively, do not work?

I appreciate the Lincoln show being there from a historical perspective, but what is the point of running an attraction that is far less than half full at every showing?
What would be the point of replacing it with such little space? As you stated, it’s a historical attraction that some people still enjoy. That’s the point of running it.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
What would be the point of replacing it with such little space? As you stated, it’s a historical attraction that some people still enjoy. That’s the point of running it.

Certainly there comes a point where paying the money to maintain and operate the attraction is no longer validated by the number of guests visiting it. Replacing it outright is hard, because of the lack of space, but space won't prevent them from tweaking the show every few years to try to encourage more guest visits. Lincoln is probably the one show that has had more updates (and also "permanent" closures) in park history.
 

SuddenStorm

Well-Known Member
Because they actually, objectively, do not work?

I appreciate the Lincoln show being there from a historical perspective, but what is the point of running an attraction that is far less than half full at every showing?

I think Lincoln does just fine, for a few reasons aside from the historical stuff.

You couldn't put a super high demand attraction there- it would cause a crowd flow nightmare due to it's proximity to the main gate and parade route.

The show appeals to an older demographic- it's good to have something for the grandparents.

It only requires one CM to run the show, so theoretically the labor costs of running the attraction, and only having to maintain one animatronic means it isn't necessarily a huge financial burden to operate.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom