I used the roads situation as an example of some of the problems which are occurring in the area. Staffing will more than likely be reduced and crowd control will be a consideration. Years ago we took a trip to Europe and had one day to visit Venice. We pre-purchased tickets to tour St. Mark’s Basilica. Turns out that the previous week there was some flooding in the square which caused cancellation of scheduled events, one of which was some large ceremony at the Basilica. The event was rescheduled for the day we were there and all tours were canceled. Of course we were disappointed but there was nothing we could do. Considering what is going on in FL with the flooding, storm damage, people being forced from their homes, homes being destroyed and people not all that far away getting hurt and dying, throwing a hissy fit because you can’t get to ride Soarin’ seems pretty petty and selfish to me. Consider the bigger picture and situation.Really? If I have spent thousands, planned, did their reservation system only to be held at the door but resort guest get in? If the roads are that flood and dangerous then, for the sake of their cast, they shouldn't open at all.
Update from MCO -
That’s somewhat better then. I thought it was essential workers only.Curfew doesn’t include those legitimately commuting.
Based on the hole in Jurassic Parks building, the flooded Hulk coaster, and hearing Velocicoaster is also flooded, I can't imagine UO opening tomorrow.
The roads around the airport are flooded, from what I understand. That alone could have lead to this decision, though there is likely more damage to the airport than that, given how the surrounding area fared.This is huge, the airport must have some big damage. Wow
I'm guessing terminal C was probably impacted as well, which would be very disappointing to hear considering they've barely opened it...This is huge, the airport must have some big damage. Wow
I think MCO's main issue is flooded roadways, not building damage.I'm guessing terminal C was probably impacted as well, which would be very disappointing to hear considering they've barely opened it...
This is as far as I'm aware an unprecedented situation. I've never seen flooding at Universal that badly, and it really wouldn't make sense considering that multiple attractions have been what can at the very least be said to be adversely impacted...Are these areas designed to flood?
I’m not familiar with Universal but every flood photo I’ve seen seems to be ponds that are up a couple feet, the lagoon that’s up a couple feet, a canal that’s up a couple feet… in other words low lying areas of water that are now higher than normal. Curious if this is intentional as a type of retention pond or if this is an unprecedented situation.
Update from MCO -
I’m surprised it’s that quick…to be honest.I'm sure THAT place is a mess... just cleaning up all the beach area has to be a nightmare.. let alone cleaning out all the overflow everywhere.
Update from MCO -
She is a reporter with a local news channel - they likely sent it directly to the newsroom.There's nothing on the official MCO feed or website though.
Ah ok. Fair enough.She is a reporter with a local news channel - they likely sent it directly to the newsroom.
I believe most of that building is just a shell to hide the elevated flume system so hopefully, the damage is mostly cosmetic.Two rides that come to mind as designed for USH then plopped here are that one and Transformers. I wonder if Transformers suffered similar damage?
For those people with less common reasoning ability than their cat?so as the storm shifted roughly 48 hours out and continued to shift - did he warn anyone where the storm actually came ashore?
Well…without waking up this morning to check, the “playbook was set”:Local news was updating constantly.
Those of us in the impacted and potentially impacted areas who were paying attention knew where it was.
This was no failure of reporting.
These are not small ponds. Open up an aerial of Loews Portofino Bay Hotel and you’ll see that the lagoon at the hotel is part of the resort wide waterway system. It’s a massive area to be raised even a foot or two.Are these areas designed to flood?
I’m not familiar with Universal but every flood photo I’ve seen seems to be ponds that are up a couple feet, the lagoon that’s up a couple feet, a canal that’s up a couple feet… in other words low lying areas of water that are now higher than normal. Curious if this is intentional as a type of retention pond or if this is an unprecedented situation.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.