Smugpugmug
Well-Known Member
Based off of what I'm hearing about it, I would need to go to one of the AMC theaters that has a bar. This isn't a movie you can be sober for.Go see HM, TWDC needs your support!
Based off of what I'm hearing about it, I would need to go to one of the AMC theaters that has a bar. This isn't a movie you can be sober for.Go see HM, TWDC needs your support!
Another person I forgot to put on ignore. Thanks for the reminder.Wait, @BuddyThomas does not like this movie? TWDC is doomed.
Sorry…not haunted mansion…This isn't a crap movie though. It's not a home run but also not a strikeout. It's just a single. Of course, there's a sentiment that Disney is paying like it expects at least a double every time.
Let’s stop slagging @BuddyThomas. I don’t always agree with him and think he tends to respond and provoke in an overly emotional way at times, but we should acknowledge, encourage, and appreciate intellectual honesty when it’s displayed and demonstrated here.Another person I forgot to put on ignore. Thanks for the reminder.
Good points. I rescind my steampunk comment then, I was thinking mostly in terms of art that I've seen under the category of steampunk, which is more of the "fantastical Victorian dreamscape" variety.That is fair. I think a lot of it is what Rolly Crump complained about near the end of his life. He said the company has lost the human touch. The style that was in the Tiki Room and HM he worked on was very much that. Almost grotesque if not curious, and the HM has that with victorian surrealism. It is just that steampunk has become to mean specifically steam powered thing.
Personally I think the itneractive queue made it worse.
Those busts and their features look right out of 1313 Dead End Drive Board game and do not match the world at all.
Most steampunk is designed to look like it's from the Victorian era so it's easy to make that correlation.Good points. I rescind my steampunk comment then, I was thinking mostly in terms of art that I've seen under the category of steampunk, which is more of the "fantastical Victorian dreamscape" variety.
Yeah. I think the line between what we think of as Gothic and Victorian is blurred. Steampunk is definitely a subset of the era, but I think it’s more the use of fantastical devices or more modern technology with the accoutrements of the era (hence, “steam”)Most steampunk is designed to look like it's from the Victorian era so it's easy to make that correlation.
But you like everything. It sincerely worries me for TWDC.Another person I forgot to put on ignore. Thanks for the reminder.
What’s intellectually dishonest is the implication that @BuddyThomas’s candour is anything new. Throughout the movie threads, those of us who are characterised as Disney apologists have posted frank reviews based on firsthand experience, offering criticism as well as praise. Meanwhile, a host of individuals who’ve never even seen the films in question have inundated the threads with kneejerk negativity about them. They are the ones from whom some honesty should be welcomed.Let’s stop slagging @BuddyThomas. I don’t always agree with him and think he tends to respond and provoke in an overly emotional way at times, but we should acknowledge, encourage, and appreciate intellectual honesty when it’s displayed and demonstrated here.
He had every incentive and reason to soft-walk his tepid response to this film, or could very well have kept it to himself. He didn’t. I very much appreciate that.
I never suggested this was “new.” I think he’s been honest.What’s intellectually dishonest is the implication that @BuddyThomas’s candour is anything new. Throughout the movie threads, those of us who are characterised as Disney apologists have posted frank reviews based on firsthand experience, offering criticism as well as praise. Meanwhile, a host of individuals who’ve never even seen the films in question have inundated the threads with kneejerk negativity about them. They are the ones from whom some honesty should be welcomed.
I have seen BuddyThomas criticize a few Disney movies here… some people choose to see the movies before they judgeBut you like everything. It sincerely worries me for TWDC.
I have not seen HM yet.I have seen BuddyThomas criticize a few Disney movies here… some people choose to see the movies before they judge
To me, it's all about the story. I hope it does well.Overall, I enjoyed the movie, but it definitely seemed like it was made for Disney+ and not for a theatrical release.
The pacing is all over the place, at times the movie feels incredibly low budget and then other times it feels big budget.
I do like the story they created around the Mansion and why they couldn't just leave the house all together as well as The Hatbox Ghost being the main villain of the story and really, the movies themes of grief and loss are all things I thought were tackled really well.
The first act is slow and choppy but by the time the second act rolls along it moves.
I still think the movie will flop hard, but it'll find a home on Disney+ during the Halloween season.
Of course… that’s the way it should beI have not seen HM yet.
Am I allowed to be hopeful that HM will be good by seeing the trailers only?
So we have to see it before we rate it… that is going to be a problem for someIf you've seen Haunted Mansion, please rate it on a scale of 1 - 10. Please chose one of the scores below:
- 1
- 10
Thank-you for your participation!!!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.