Kind of making my point there. There's no way Iger is concerned about the miniscule liscensing fee Disney pays for the rights to the Twilight Zone name.
It is not so much the money that could be saved but rather the potential of what could be earned.
I'll grant you, Iger likes to talk about franchises. But really, who cares what Iger says? Most of what comes out of his mouth in public is specifically intended to placate shareholders and has little to do with the actual direction the company will be taking.
This is just so removed from the truth I can't even respond. :lol::wave:
Also, Tower of Terror is not a franchise. Twilight Zone is. The average person has no idea what the Tower of Terror is. And I don't see Disney attempting to build a franchise around a (great) theme park ride that the average public knows nothing about that has always been associated with a property they don't own.
Disney wants to own 100% of all it produces now. This is even more justification for retheming the tower.
I could be wrong, but I don't see them mining this territory unless they have a string of hits based on theme park attractions beyond Pirates and HM. I think the most likely candidate for a big screen adaptation is the long-rumored BTM movie.
Don't forget Jungle Cruise is still possible. This is more than a trend.
If HM is a hit, BTM becomes that much more likely. If BTM gets made and is a hit, Disney will start looking at what other theme park attractions it could possibly adapt. I imagine the Tower of Terror would still be pretty low on the list though given the Twilight Zone theme.
We will have to agree to disagree.