*Pops head into thread
*see's the same people who were extremely negative before the ride was even built still being super negative and repeating the same dribble as before
*Leaves thread
This looks like a strong, enjoyable ride.
However...
I don't think that was ever much in doubt. Pretty much every criticism levelled against this ride in the years of construction has turned out to be correct and the defenses against those criticisms incorrect.
It's in the wrong park. The "Quill went to EPCOT" backstory is ham-handed, awkward, and even offensive in its implementation. There's no edutainment content at all.
It absolutely does NOT reflect the amount of money spent on it.
There are no AAs and it is VERY screen heavy, to the comical extreme that the supposed stars of the attraction only ever appear on screens that are about the size of household televisions. The overdone screeniness is particularly visible in the preshow, which teleports guests from one room full of screens to another, very similar room full of screens.
The queue is underwhelming, just as the concept art suggested.
The ride building is very visible and intrusive.
The one exciting piece of concept art turns out to be of a scene that is NOT in the ride in any way, shape, or form.
So it's a little rich to accuse folks of "repeating the same dribble" when they were correct. For years, boosters have been shouting, "you can't criticize the ride, we haven't seen the finished product!" Well, it turns out the critics were right, and now the boosters are looking for other ways to shut down criticism.