HauntedMansionFLA
Well-Known Member
That's the question of the day!! Hopefully someone can clue us in. Very interesting permitSo does that mean GotG is the reason behind this permit filing?
That's the question of the day!! Hopefully someone can clue us in. Very interesting permitSo does that mean GotG is the reason behind this permit filing?
With something possibly happening here, will they continue to leave the WoL empty right next to a new offering like gotg if they build it?
Hopefully there are some plans for that area in the future.Yes. For now.
No, not necessarily.
You know, I just can't get past the feeling I've been feeling recently that the Bob's want to "Universal-fy" the theme parks, in an off-shoot of Uni's "Ride the Movies" premise. It started with the changes to PotC to incorporate the movie into the ride that inspired the movie (Likely something Iger wanted when he took the reigns from ME). The changes to the Tower out in CA. You'll be piloting the Millennium Falcon on both coasts... some year in the future. Pandora. FEA. Continued rumblings about GotG going in somewhere at WDW. If I want to just "ride the movies", I'll go up I-4. I want original, classic, timeless rides and attractions like those that endeared WDW in the hearts and minds of millions. I don't want a bunch of "de-risked" attractions completely tied to various IP because that's the "safer" option. Sadly, I don't see any of that happening in today's TWDC, at least not while the Bob's and their MBA ilk are in charge, pushing synergy and BRAND at every opportunity in their never-ending quest to satiate Wall St. ANALysts while treating guests like walking ATM's.
So does that mean GotG is the reason behind this permit filing?
That's the question of the day!! Hopefully someone can clue us in. Very interesting permit
If you've paid for the engineering work on adjusting/increasing your impermeable space, why would you delay moving forward? This isn't a permit for a building or even part of a building. It is a water management permit and they can proceed everything from a new sidewalk to an entire new park.It seems like this project is full steam ahead once again. Personally I don't buy the idea that they are preparing construction but haven't decided on a proposal.
This is a permit to prepare the area for building work. A month ago I'd have said it's for the Guardians addition to the Energy pavilion.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
It just misses WOLLooks like we might have the first permit for this project. A permit was filed with the South Florida Water Management District today to re-route the canal behind Energy and create two new retention ponds (POND-20 and POND-21). The permit provides the reason for this work as:
"The applicant wishes to reconfigure the existing canal to provide a more-contiguous area for possible future changes to parking capacity and back of house areas. A spur of the existing canal is proposed to be filled so that a more developable area is provided."
It also says:
"The possible future impervious areas were estimated based on manual take-offs of the input received by the applicant. The area where the construction laydown is to be located is assumed to have paved roadways into the area, a number of construction trailers as impervious, and the remainder of area to be gravel."
View attachment 205123
Yes. For now.
This is a permit to prepare the area for building work. A month ago I'd have said it's for the Guardians addition to the Energy pavilion.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
5th gate confirmed, Sidewalkland!!!If you've paid for the engineering work on adjusting/increasing your impermeable space, why would you delay moving forward? This isn't a permit for a building or even part of a building. It is a water management permit and they can proceed everything from a new sidewalk to an entire new park.
Thank youThis is a permit to prepare the area for building work. A month ago I'd have said it's for the Guardians addition to the Energy pavilion.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
I will stand by cautious optimism in that case.This is a permit to prepare the area for building work. A month ago I'd have said it's for the Guardians addition to the Energy pavilion.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
Maybe someone in WDI realized that it wouldn't fit Epcot or is that too much to hope for?Any insight in to the sudden change of heart they had?
Maybe someone in WDI realized that it wouldn't fit Epcot or is that too much to hope for?
I wouldn't call it a change of heart. More like questions that are still being answered. The Guardians IP isn't a write off yet. I'll say more when I can.Any insight in to the sudden change of heart they had?
I wouldn't call it a change of heart. More like questions that are still being answered. The Guardians IP isn't a write off yet. I'll say more when I can.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
Are we getting something better?This is a permit to prepare the area for building work. A month ago I'd have said it's for the Guardians addition to the Energy pavilion.
Now I'll say it's for a proposed addition to the Energy pavilion.
I'd be surprised if we got an attraction radically different than the one proposed.Are we getting something better?
I'd be surprised if we got an attraction radically different than the one proposed.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.