PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
Do I think the signs should be more explicit regarding what dangers could potentially be encountered? Absolutely. But Disney may have felt they were legally covered by the "No Swimming" Signs. Per a CNN article:
When it comes to alligator attacks, courts in Florida have held that a swimmer's disregard of "No Swimming" and other warning signs were the sole cause of the serious injuries.
Due to the vast number of languages spoken by Disney guests, any signs that warn of reptilian risks will probably need to include some sort of pictorial aspect as well. And you know some parent is going to whine that the picture scared their precious snowflakes and gave them nightmares, thus "ruining their whole vacation". Disney probably felt hanged if they did/hanged if they didn't, and just hoped they'd never have to deal with the issue.
Signage isn't the issue..... As for years many of us have enjoyed the poly/g Fla beach without issue & without seeing any.
So what changed? Food.