First, I don't see a need to close the thread. After 80 pages of discussion, if you don't want to read it, stop clicking on the thread.
I would be curious to see the decades of paperwork of wild animal management at WDW and what they paid to who for services, whatever they may be from gator management to use of pesticides for flying critters.
Most of us adults here who went from the 70s on have seen the decline of what the seven seas lagoon used to be, even before River Country.
I suspect with each year of reduction of those costs, and/or non-renewal of contracts there is an increase in the the salaries and bonuses paid to the bean counters and suits of TDO for their forethought of saving the company money by taking the route of non-responsibility and a cheap sign that says "No Swimming".
Talk about a situation of "What would Walt do." He'd spend the money to do the job right, not lay the blame/responsibility on the fact that technically, Fish/Wildlife govt is responsible. The whole point of the Reedy Creek thing was to give some autonomy and to not rely on local or federal agencies to accomplish progress.
In this case, progress was creating a man-made lagoon surrounded by resorts full of people. With that comes responsibility, especially with what they are charging.
