disnyfan89
Well-Known Member
My understanding from individuals I have talked to is that the entire place is a mess. I mean the sprinkle system went off in there. That cant be good for any of the show elements.
I've been visiting DLand quite a bit over the past year and have seen the original show there many many times.
It is in my opinion that converting the show to the original may not be that hard. Most of the stuff we hate about Under New Management was just additions and not changes/removals to the original show. All they would have to do is remove the Iago(s) and Zazu, and remove the Uh Oa (sp?) and replace her with a very basic fountain.
Another thing may be an issue could be the programming. The original WDW show was most likely not digital but UNM may be digital. So if there isn't a digital programming of the original show, that could delay or prevent any changes. You also couldn't just swap in DLR's programming because there are so many different animatronics.
But everything else is already in there really. They could have done something in time for the 40th had they not had their heads buried in their checkbooks and realize some things like the tiki room need attention sooner rather than later.
Heck, they could even market it as "Getting back to the classic for the 40th"
Disney would never invest in it and say feature it in The Celebrate a Dream Come True Parade, Wishes Fireworks...
I wonder... Does Disney hold fire insurance on their buildings and attractions? If they do, I think we could easily see a change to the show, because some of the cost is covered.
If they don't, I fear we'll see yet another building in Adventureland shuttered.
Unless Yoda is right, and the AA's aren't cooked.
Love it Love it Love it!!!!!!!!!:ROFLOL:There's a fire in the Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Room. The Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Room. All the birds sing words and the flowers burn in the Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Room!
I think in the majority of cases you would be hard pressed to find individuals who could tell you who Lady Tremain, Pongo, Anastasia, Horace, Drizella, Lucifer, Jasper, Bruno, Jaq, Gus, Suzy, Perla, maurice, Roger, Anita, Perdita, lefu, Sergeant Tibbs, Patch, Philippe, Lucky, Penny, Madame De la Grande Bouche Wardrobe, Babette, Monsieur D'Arque, Tiger Lilly, John, and Michael are.The fact that Disney uses characters from Aladdin in many places does not prove the movie has a hold on the public consciousness. I would still argue that at this point (19 years from release) the movie is fairly obscure. The main characters (Aladdin, Genie, Jasmine) are known by some (especially Disney fans), but secondary characters like Jafar, Iago and the King are definitely not well-known among the general public. For Disney fanatics like us, our kids might know of them from going to WDW, playing Disney trivia, and maybe watching the movie at the suggestion of their Disney-fanatic parents (as I did for my kids) but I would bet most kids today have never even seen the movie.
Disney uses characters from all films in the parks, which is cool. I will never tire of seeing Snow White and Seven Dwarfs in the parks even though that movie was released in 1938. But that movie is a classic, like Cinderella, The Lion King, Beauty & The Beast, Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, etc.
Movies like Aladdin, Mulan, Tarzan, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Brother Bear, etc. are "second tier" movies that Disney fans would know, the general public would only vaguely remember, and most children born after 2000 would not know at all.
Movies like Aladdin, Mulan, Tarzan, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Brother Bear, etc. are "second tier" movies that Disney fans would know, the general public would only vaguely remember, and most children born after 2000 would not know at all.
Both Jafar and Iago have roles featured in various stage shows as well and Jafar is one of the featured Villians with his own segment in Fantasmic!
Seeing that the Tiki Room will now be closed for a month
Did I miss this somewhere? Or is this a guess?
The fact that Disney uses characters from Aladdin in many places does not prove the movie has a hold on the public consciousness. I would still argue that at this point (19 years from release) the movie is fairly obscure. The main characters (Aladdin, Genie, Jasmine) are known by some (especially Disney fans), but secondary characters like Jafar, Iago and the King are definitely not well-known among the general public. For Disney fanatics like us, our kids might know of them from going to WDW, playing Disney trivia, and maybe watching the movie at the suggestion of their Disney-fanatic parents (as I did for my kids) but I would bet most kids today have never even seen the movie.
Disney uses characters from all films in the parks, which is cool. I will never tire of seeing Snow White and Seven Dwarfs in the parks even though that movie was released in 1938. But that movie is a classic, like Cinderella, The Lion King, Beauty & The Beast, Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, etc.
Movies like Aladdin, Mulan, Tarzan, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Brother Bear, etc. are "second tier" movies that Disney fans would know, the general public would only vaguely remember, and most children born after 2000 would not know at all.
Reports from Twitter saying cast members outside the attraction are telling guests the attraction won't reopen for a month.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.