danlb_2000
Premium Member
I believe a new agreement came into force that just took into account the current situation around the lake. It basically was simply giving guest access from the hotels to the WS entry. The monorail clause was a pullback to say if a monorail - which was one of the planned options for future development initially - was built to the Swalphin, then the easement would go to the monorail station instead.
Nice find.
Yep, this is basically what this document says:
"...the Promenade Easement shall revive and continue from the Hotel Property only to a point on the Promenade nearest to the place of embarkation and debarkation for the monorail..."
Posts like this are outright hostile and unnecessary. If someone doesn't agree, that's okay. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let the people who want to talk about it talk about it without being disrupted by posts like these.
Sorry, you can't say everyone is entitled to their opinion, but call someone out because you don't like what they posted. There was nothing hostile in that post, he was just expressing his opinion in the course of this thread.