Atomicmickey
Well-Known Member
I don't understand the hate for clones. Jungle Cruise, Haunted Mansion, Space Mt.,Pirates, Big Thunder,Spalsh Mt.,Buzz, Peter Pan, Small World, Hall of Presidents, Tower Of Terror, Toy Story Mania, Rock & roller Coaster, Indy, Soarin, etc. Too many to mention, yet all the parks also have unique attractions or clones that just seem better than the others. I for one think the more clones the better. You can still have new rides, but don't discount the appeal of being able to see the "great attractions" from all around the world in one place. Also, most people do not have the means to travel to all the resorts around the world to see maybe one or two major attractions found else where. Cloning saves money which could mean more attractions under a set budget
I don't mind a good clone, it's fun to debate which is better. Don't get me wrong, I'd be ecstatic if
they announced a RSR clone for DHS. BUT--that same general ride experience can already be had
at Test Track. I don't know that I'm all that excited to "ride" RSR--but I sure as heck want to SEE
that amazing mountain environment, and the show scenes. So a "mini-clone" might not have the
same appeal. If you're gonna clone, go big or go home! Bring the full mountain range to DHS,
then we're talkin', I think! (though I'd rather see Disney innovate a new hi-tech ride system like
HBFJ has done)