Jim Hill is a company man and huffing some pretty powerful pixie dust in the same vain as Capt. Smurf - probably stronger - I sometimes think that when you get him slightly to go off key he can be interesting. But his entire article is deceptive like himself - he is a company man who writes articles, like this one, in his pro company stance to gain more media invites, gain more clicks and most of all to gain more ad revenue.
Reinvestment is good - if it is used sensibility like I don't know keeping the old Disney rule in effect of SHOW BEING MORE IMPORTANT THAN EFFICIENCY, otherwise you wouldn't have people complaining about broken AA, effects being switched off, etc. Because without care for what you have is an amusement park.
Otherwise he would notice that TDA seemingly has a great passion for the product and has vision for the resort then look at TDO, which is a bunch of myopic bean counter pocket book protector wearing morons who couldn't see vision if it slapped them on the rear end and say 'You've pulled'.
So then what is the huge draw for each park Mr. Hill is it the 'New, new but not really new Fantasyland expansion - with its French but not French restaurant, or is it the new expansion but not really of Fastamic arena in DHS. Because people didn't complain that DM at UNI wasn't an E-ticket, instead they loved it as a new attraction, to ya know freshen the place up. But I'm sure people inside the company are begging you to big up the Next Gen as well as the FP+ program as the next huge draw for visitors, and their ADD and OCD families.
