Disney Studios rumored lands

Launchpad McQuack

Launchpad McQuack

Well-Known Member
I don't necessarily think any of the other Pixar franchises need their own land. Basically just really beef up Pixar Place with a few attractions featuring Pixar characters/movies. Have a larger Pixar Place "land" with Toy Story Land being an offshoot of it, like Storybook Circus is to Fantasyland.
 
Rich T

Rich T

Well-Known Member
Launchpad McQuack said:
I don't necessarily think any of the other Pixar franchises need their own land. Basically just really beef up Pixar Place with a few attractions featuring Pixar characters/movies. Have a larger Pixar Place "land" with Toy Story Land being an offshoot of it, like Storybook Circus is to Fantasyland.
Click to expand...
I think, going forward, we're going to see less and less park distinction between Pixar and Disney Animation until the difference is not even mentioned anymore, and--to that end--it would just make more sense to have an "animation" land as opposed to Pixar only. Already, the general public sees no distinction (they see Merida as a Disney princess and Nemo as a Disney fish), and the quality of the two studios' output is about equal now and stylistically very similar; Zootopia could have been a Pixar film and Inside Out could have been Disney (and most of the public couldn't tell you which studio did which). Years ago there was a clear distinction in style. That line is being rapidly erased.
 
Brer Panther

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
Rich T said:
I think, going forward, we're going to see less and less park distinction between Pixar and Disney Animation until the difference is not even mentioned anymore, and--to that end--it would just make more sense to have an "animation" land as opposed to Pixar only. Already, the general public sees no distinction (they see Merida as a Disney princess and Nemo as a Disney fish), and the quality of the two studios' output is about equal now and stylistically very similar; Zootopia could have been a Pixar film and Inside Out could have been Disney (and most of the public couldn't tell you which studio did which). Years ago there was a clear distinction in style. That line is being rapidly erased.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing these are the same people who say that "Ice Age" was made by DreamWorks?
 
djkidkaz

djkidkaz

Well-Known Member
Ignohippo said:
I laughed out loud at that! Thanks!

Yeah, I've heard some people saying that RSR would go back there, and I don't see how. It would have to be really, really show horned in for that to happen.
Click to expand...

They could put Cars Land where Indy is and where we all presumed SWL was going. It would be much easier to theme it connecting off Hollywood Blvd than Star Wars land would have been.
 
Thanks phoenicians

Thanks phoenicians

Well-Known Member
I know other insiders have said possibly one more big attraction and maybe some new shows and such as a plussing to the entire park. Probably not a whole land for phase 3
 
D

doctornick

Well-Known Member
Lee said:
Umm....not that I'm aware of.
Like I said SW and TS.
Click to expand...

I don't want to be pedantic, but is that more of a "no one has told me anything but I didn't really ask" or "my connections tell me that nothing is on the table after Star Wars is done"? Other folks like IIRC @marni1971 and @MansionButler84 have suggested that at least one if not more new rides are in the works beyond the announced Toy Story and Star Wars stuff.

I'd be extremely disappointed if nothing else occurs in the near future beyond those two announced lands.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom