Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
Just saying that modern musical movies don't do well. Cats, The Greatest Showman, Westside Story all failed. I guess Wicked is different.
Just saying that modern musical movies don't do well. Cats, The Greatest Showman, Westside Story all failed. I guess Wicked is different.
The big issue is they don't know how to direct a musical these days for film. But I am seeing a lot of people saying Jon Chu gets it, and this is up there with Chicago, Mamma Mia, etc.
The Greatest Showman is a GREAT movie!
Not to mention that West Side was still a pandemic release, even in late 2021.Exactly.
But yes, many other recent attempts have failed. But Wicked is a beast of property. It had far wider audience appeal than Cats, or West Side Story, and it only fails if it’s bad, and so far it sounds like it’s good. Audiences will show up.
Just saying that modern musical movies don't do well. Cats, The Greatest Showman, Westside Story all failed. I guess Wicked is different.
The real question is are families going to see it or Moana? With most families only seeing a max of one movie a month, its going to be a choice.Wicked currently at 92% on RT based on 111 reviews.
I can't not see it being a hit at this point, despite the common criticism of its length.
I’m not usually a movie musical guy (although I enjoy live theater musicals) but this movie was great.
The real question is are families going to see it or Moana? With most families only seeing a max of one movie a month, its going to be a choice.
Though I have seen online some rumblings about a "Barbenheimer" type thing potentially happen with Moana and Wicked. What do we call that, "Micked", "Moicked", "Wioana"?
I’ve been hearing it more as Wicked paired with Gladiator.The real question is are families going to see it or Moana? With most families only seeing a max of one movie a month, its going to be a choice.
Though I have seen online some rumblings about a "Barbenheimer" type thing potentially happen with Moana and Wicked. What do we call that, "Micked", "Moicked", "Wioana"?
Haven’t seen it!I’m not usually a movie musical guy (although I enjoy live theater musicals) but this movie was great.
Whoever cast it did an amazing job. Every character played their part perfectly.
That’s shocking, the music is amazing and Jackman, Efron, and Zendaya are wonderful. The whole cast was great.Haven’t seen it!
I think good movies can lift all movies….if you had a great time at the theater a person is more likely to go againI think there will be some cross over. People will defy expectations if the films are good. Good films bring people out, more than the averages we expect.
If they are picking one over the other, families will be going to Moana, and you’ll see a similar audience to Barbie hitting up Wicked.
Musicals are a tough sell for me. (I know, I know. )That’s shocking, the music is amazing and Jackman, Efron, and Zendaya are wonderful. The whole cast was great.
Songs for the sake of songs in a musical drive me bonkers. If someone is walking down the street and singing about walking down the street - rather than advancing the plot - I’m bored.
You want songs to be utilitarian? Great!! Got one for you....
In defense of Cats, which is an awful movie, I will give the movie credit for trying something unique with its aesthetic and approach. It didn't work out at all, but I at least felt somewhat of an effort was made. For that reason alone, I think it's superior to the other 2019-cat related abomination — the creatively bankrupt remake of The Lion King.On thing is for certain, it should be better than Cats.
In theory the 2.5 hour runtime might seem like a deterrent yet almost all of the highest grossing movies of all time — both Avatars, Titanic, Avengers Endgame — are more than 3 hours long. This isn't just a recent trend. If you adjust for inflation and look at the 10 highest grossing movies of all time, movies like Gone with the Wind, the Sound of Music, the Ten Commandments and Dr. Zhivago are all 3-4 hours.
If Wicked is a good movie, the runtime won't be a problem. When people are having a great time, they don't want a movie to end. It's only when the movie is mediocre that audiences really begin to feel the length.
IMO the length a movie deserves depends on the film…. I have seen 2 hour movies that felt rushed and 90 minute movies that felt like for ever watching it..for example Oppenheimer held my attention the entire time even though it was a 3 hour movie… I did not even take a bathroom break for fear of missing something…. that it was able to do that despite the subject matter… it deserved it's Oscar winsTwo hours for me is a good maximum, and anything longer I feel a movie really needs to earn it.
Avengers works because there's a lot of characters to serve and we're invested in them. Titanic as well. Avatar(s) could have used a little trimming but were acceptable.
On other other hand, there's things like the live action Transformers movies that push 2.5 hours. Why? They're padded with a lot of inane scenes. They're expensive to make so we aren't getting more action. They're dumb movies and I should walk out with at least the feeling that it was a fun ride, instead they cross over into tedium.
They did well though so who knows. Box office wise, there's probably some downside to long run times. It's more of a personal preference I guess.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.