Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Even $900M for Moana2 on a $150M budget isn't modest, that is a huge success financially even if it didn't cross $1B.

Your usage of "modest" here is flawed in my opinion.

My usage of "modest success" is in the context of the other very successful Princess movies Disney has released that easily went to $1.5 Billion or above (inflation adjusted for movies from the 1990's-2010's) at the global box office.

If Moana 2 had come from some small indy animation studio out of Portland, Oregon who had a tiny budget and an old cappuccino machine in the break room to work with and no previous track record for blockbusters, then the Moana 2 box office from a studio like that would be massive and mind blowingly huge. o_O

But for the The Walt Disney Company and its annual Thanksgiving release window? Moana 2 is a modest success globally. And owing to its comparatively small Made For TV production budget, it's already profitable for Burbank. Which is probably all they care about.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
My usage of "modest success" is in the context of the other very successful Princess movies Disney has released that easily went to $1.5 Billion or above (inflation adjusted for movies from the 1990's-2010's) at the global box office.

If Moana 2 had come from some small indy animation studio out of Portland, Oregon who had a tiny budget and an old cappuccino machine in the break room to work with and no previous track record for blockbusters, then the Moana 2 box office from a studio like that would be massive and mind blowingly huge. o_O

But for the The Walt Disney Company and its annual Thanksgiving release window? Moana 2 is a modest success globally. And owing to its comparatively small Made For TV production budget, it's already profitable for Burbank. Which is probably all they care about.
If you're just comparing it to other Disney releases, why not End Game or Avatar then too. Because in that context Moana 2 is a huge failure because it didn't make $2B or more.

This is why context matters, its a huge financial success for its franchise compared to the first movie. Its also a huge financial success based on its budget. This "modest success" usage is not really putting things into perspective.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
If you're just comparing it to other Disney releases, why not End Game or Avatar then too.

Because those are PG-13 action movies aimed at a different audience than a G/PG rated Princess cartoon.

See my comparison of the inflation non-adjusted comparison of Moana 2 and Star Wars as an example of how silly that becomes. Moana 2 should mainly be compared to other Disney Princess cartoons, not Gone With The Wind or Titanic.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Because those are PG-13 action movies aimed at a different audience than a G/PG rated Princess cartoon.

See my comparison of the inflation non-adjusted comparison of Moana 2 and Star Wars as an example of how silly that becomes. Moana 2 should mainly be compared to other Disney Princess cartoons, not Gone With The Wind or Titanic.
This is why this whole thing needs to be put into perspective. Comparing to other movies is fine again if put into perspective. Because compared to its budget its a huge financial success even if it hasn't hit $1B yet, and saying otherwise is not being honest and just looking to pick fights.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Happy to do that. Interestingly, the budget for Frozen II in 2019 had no inflation from Frozen in 2012. They both had budgets of $150 Million in their respective years, but that was a $22 Million budget deflation for Frozen II in 2019.



I don't power up and turn on the blinky lights in the TP2000 Global Command Center until after I've had lunch. And trust me when I say that Mr. Johnson is not a morning person either, and he won't even put on his white lab coat until Noon at the earliest. :rolleyes:

But I'm here now in the Command Center and I've turned on the blinky lights and Mr. Johnson is in full costume. So here's how the inflation adjusted chart looks like for those movies. This is a fun one, because I had forgotten how much Strange World absolutely bombed two years ago! Phew, that one was brutal. :hungover:

View attachment 831572




I don't know why we wouldn't adjust historic box office for inflation? I don't think there's a need to do that for films from only a year or two ago, but there's definitely a need to factor in the 20% or more rise in costs from pre-Covid and any movie released in 2019 or earlier. There's a reason The Numbers site offers a prominent "Inflation Adjusted" switch on charts.

If you don't adjust for inflation, you get charts that can look like this showing Moana 2 on track to beat Star Wars at the global box office. (Extreme and witty example, but I think you get my point that inflation matters to budgets and profits)

View attachment 831570

You may certainly do so, but then you need to caveat that Moana 2 has the lowest budget of any film from WDAS. The two essentially cancel one another out, but that visually isn’t as easy to spot on the fancy chart.

I think you are smart enough to realize you are constantly playing with films on your charts and present us the ones that best sell your chosen narrative. Some of your comps are completely wild, or you wouldn’t bring up Barbie every few days.

Of course we all know how to engage in TP charting, just play with enough toggles and random comps and you can pretty much say whatever you want about any film. Then say Oof!


IMG_3159.jpeg
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Wait, Moana 2 is only a modest success? 🤣

Try extricating yourself from the thread and then reading this stuff cold.

With a hint of dismal. Wicked is a total flop I fear.

But buckle up because I actually think we’re all about to have a total heyday with Mufasa, Moana 2 is modestly boring; so I appreciate the funny repartee TP is actually quite good at driving!
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
This is why this whole thing needs to be put into perspective. Comparing to other movies is fine again if put into perspective. Because compared to its budget its a huge financial success even if it hasn't hit $1B yet, and saying otherwise is not being honest and just looking to pick fights.
Yeah I don't get where TP2000 is coming from, besides possibly trolling. I REALLY don't like Moana 2 and what its success means for the future of Disney animation, but even I can't deny it's a major success from a financial perspective.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
You may certainly do so, but then you need to caveat that Moana 2 has the lowest budget of any film from WDAS. The two essentially cancel one another out, but that visually isn’t as easy to spot on the fancy chart.

I think you are smart enough to realize you are constantly playing with films on your charts and present us the ones that best sell your chosen narrative. Some of your comps are completely wild, or you wouldn’t bring up Barbie every few days.

Of course we all know how to engage in TP charting, just play with enough toggles and random comps and you can pretty much say whatever you want about any film. Then say Oof!


View attachment 831579
I mean if we're doing comparisons, why not this years other animation releases not named Inside Out 2 -

1734651596550.png


I mean compared to Moana 2's "moderate success" those others are surely failures.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You may certainly do so, but then you need to caveat that Moana 2 has the lowest budget of any film from WDAS. The two essentially cancel one another out, but that visually isn’t as easy to spot on the fancy chart.

How many times do I have to repeat the phrase Made For TV budget in this thread? It's already coming up on a dozen or so in the past week. That's what helped Moana 2 reach profitability so quickly in its third week, even with unimpressuive overseas box office and modest success at home.

I think you are smart enough to realize you are constantly playing with films on your charts and present us the ones that best sell your chosen narrative. Some of your comps are completely wild, or you wouldn’t bring up Barbie every few days.

Many of the comps discussed in the past week were brought up here by others, and I happily plugged them in. Care to suggest one we haven't discussed yet? Maybe there's some inflation adjusted analogy to 1992's Aladdin, for example?

Name a film, and I can have Mr. Johnson insert an IBM card into his console for us.

Of course we all know how to engage in TP charting, just play with enough toggles and random comps and you can pretty much say whatever you want about any film. Then say Oof!


View attachment 831579

You forgot to include the actual financial figures at the bottom of that chart. Oof! Here's what that chart looks like adjusted for inflation and including Moana 2.

Every Cool Clique Has a Modest Member.jpg


Using a quick 50% of global box office and some damp cocktail napkin math that adds half the production budget to account for the marketing, I come up with these broad ballpark figures for profit on these five profitable movies:

Moana 2 = $135 Million profit and counting, AKA "Modest Success So Far"
Avengers = $900 Million profit, AKA "Blockbuster Of The Decade"
Avatar = $1.6 Billion (with a B) profit, AKA "Blockbuster Of The Century"
Barbie = $500 Million profit, AKA "Blockbuster Of The Year"
Frozen = $540 Million profit, AKA "Blockbuster Of The Year"

Moana 2 is on track to do a tad over half the global box office that Frozen did, adjusted for inflation. It's profit will likely be less than half of Frozen's, even with its small Made For TV production budget. Surely we can see that there's a difference in financial and cultural impact between something like Frozen and Moana 2?

At least I can see that difference. It's sitting right there in plain numbers. :)

 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I mean if we're doing comparisons, why not this years other animation releases not named Inside Out 2 -

View attachment 831581

I mean compared to Moana 2's "moderate success" those others are surely failures.

One eeked out a small profit, two were modest successes, one was the clear winner (Despicable Me). You have to include the financials and their budgets to get that story. A chart alone doesn't prove much unless every movie on the chart has the exact same production and marketing costs.

Toon Town.jpg


Moana 2 = $135 Million profit so far
Despicable Me 4 = $335 Million profit
Kung Fu Panda 4 = $145 Million profit
Garfield = $30 Million profit

Choosing from that list, I'd rather be the studio exec who approved Despicable Me 4, wouldn't you?

 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
One eeked out a small profit, two were modest successes, one was the clear winner (Despicable Me). You have to include the financials and their budgets to get that story. A chart alone doesn't prove much unless every movie on the chart has the exact same production and marketing costs.

View attachment 831583

Moana 2 = $135 Million profit so far
Despicable Me 4 = $335 Million profit
Kung Fu Panda 4 = $145 Million profit
Garfield = $30 Million profit

Choosing from that list, I'd rather be the studio exec who approved Despicable Me 4, wouldn't you?

Nope, I wouldn't want to be because if we're doing comparisons then Moana 2 is trending higher and will likely make more than Despicable Me 4. Again context matters here and you cherry pick all your data, as shown by your recent posts and all the responses to it.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Moana 2 = $135 Million profit so far
Despicable Me 4 = $335 Million profit
Kung Fu Panda 4 = $145 Million profit
Garfield = $30 Million profit

Choosing from that list, I'd rather be the studio exec who approved Despicable Me 4, wouldn't you?

I think you’ll be modestly surprised. Let’s swing back around to this one in the Spring. When both Moana finishes running and Deadline unveils the odd budgeting to marketing practices Illumination films see. I suspect Moana 2 will ultimately land 3rd in their final tally’s, but it’s going to be a close race.

I guess for clarification, do you consider DM4 to be ‘modest’? That will better help me understand what you feel that line is.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Could speculate that Mufasa would’ve made more if Moana 2 hadn’t been released a month ago. Would also love to know how much overlap there is between Moana and Sonic audiences apart from AMC/Regal subscribers.

Seems conceivable that some Disney family audiences forked over, what, $100 for tickets and concessions for Moana and decided to skip Mufasa.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Disney will cross $5B globally after this weekend, having already crossed $2B domestically -


This will have Disney ending 2024 as the undisputed top studio both domestically and globally, back on top where they belong.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
While we await the Thursday box office numbers previewing how this weekend, and perhaps all of Christmas vacation, will be shaping up...

Who would’ve imagined we’d be in a place where a sequel to Sonic is more critically lauded than a mainline Disney Princess film?

Forget Moana 2, this screenshot below taken just now doesn't seem to bode well for Mufasa!

I'm guessing the Sonic movie is aimed at boys, perhaps even up to the young men demographic who grew up with that franchise? While Moana 2 is obviously a Princess movie, and Mufasa would seem to be... maybe just a dud with everyone?

Free Markets Always Speak Clearly.jpg
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Yeah I don't get where TP2000 is coming from, besides possibly trolling. I REALLY don't like Moana 2 and what its success means for the future of Disney animation, but even I can't deny it's a major success from a financial perspective.

With all due respect, and because I always enjoy your perspective, using the word "modest" correctly in a sentence within the proper context of that sentence and subject does not equate to "trolling". :)

The data doesn't seem to show Moana 2 as a "major success" at the box office. It seems to be a "modest success", and it's trendline is heading towards flatlining rather quickly. Moana 2 has had weak legs domestically and globally since the end of Thanksgiving weekend.

Luckily, it had a very low (for Burbank) production budget because it was only supposed to be a TV show, not a big tentpole movie for Thanksgiving. So it got to profitability by its third week in theaters, even with its weak legs.

As of the box office for Wednesday, December 19th, here's what its profit looks like....

Moana 2: Production $150, Marketing $75, Domestic Take $206, Overseas Take $152 = $133 Million and counting

On its current trajectory, Moana 2 will likely pull in between $165 and $185 Million in profit for Disney. Compared to the $400 to $600 Million in profit some of Disney's other 21st century Princess movies have done, a profit of $175 Million owing to a low production budget seems like a modest success to me.

Do you know what it costs to keep the Burbank studio complex running every year with 2,500 employees with upper-middle class SoCal salaries and full medical/dental benefits and subsidized dining and free Tesla charging? Me either. But it's got to be a LOT. The Burbank studio employees can vaporize that modest profit from Moana 2 in a matter of weeks.


It's A Shame About Her Legs.jpg


 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom