stretchsje
Well-Known Member
If I may posit another theory, perhaps Jim Hill is getting his figures from WDI rather than accounting/management. He's mentioned talking with "a friend in Imagineering" many times before. Perhaps his Imagineer friend(s) aren't in a position to know about the entirety of the project or are only quoting the cost for what is beginning construction soon. Jim Hill mentioned that Iger could still change things midway through development, plus we're hearing again that this will be done through five(!!!) phases, so it stands to reason that not all of that $2.8 billion is being irrevocably committed to specific projects today.I am still a little skeptical of $1.4 - $1.6 billion going into infrastructure.
I've long had suspicions that the reason nobody knows what Muppets or Indy will look like after this redo is that Disney is deliberately hedging their bets to see what kind of success the new Muppets sitcom or Indy movie brings in for the company. There may be plans for attractions or lands for both but only pending renewed success of the respective franchises. This would show up in a $2.8 billion, "This is our estimated cost to redo the entire park," figure but not a $1.2-$1.4 billion, "This is what we know we're building now," figure.
Regardless, Jim Hill's track record is good enough that I certainly wouldn't write off his budget figure. Combining what's been said here, I believe what he's reporting is a subset of that $2.8 billion. I just wish we knew what subset or precisely where the figure came from. Then again, I'd equally like to know the breakdown of that alleged $2.8 billion budget!