Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
There is no need to have Harry in Diagon Alley. You would need the twins for Weasley Wizard Wheezes. And adding Bellatrix to to Gringott's is great. And I don't even see how he would be used on the Hogwarts Express.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
DHS CARS LAND
- Thread starter whylightbulb
- Start date
There is no need to have Harry in Diagon Alley. You would need the twins for Weasley Wizard Wheezes. And adding Bellatrix to to Gringott's is great. And I don't even see how he would be used on the Hogwarts Express.
ThemeParks4Life
Well-Known Member
What if people complain about the lack of Harry like they did with PPF and SWSA?
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
I don't think there will be many complaints about The Wizarding World of Harry Potter: Diagon Alley. Both WWOHP and WWOHP 2.0 aren't about Harry. They are about the world he lives in. That is why there is no Harry Potte Meet and Greet. And I haven't heard anyone complain. Well, except for Disney Fans. Who say stupid **** like The Flight of Peter Pan is better than Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey.
Lee
Adventurer
Fantasmic
Well-Known Member
I read there were no meet and greets because JK Rowling didn't want anyone else but the original actors to portray the characters?!
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
It was not a nod to the actors as much as she had control over who was cast, and there is no way she could have that control in an operating theme park environment.
Fantasmic
Well-Known Member
I thought it was about protecting the integrity of the characters in the parks...
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
That is sort of what I was saying about here control issues.
Fantasmic
Well-Known Member
Ahh I get ya, Agreed....
However, I would LOVE a Sirius Black meet & greet!
Cosmic Commando
Well-Known Member
Only if it's Padfoot!
GeorgiaPinesRJB
Well-Known Member
A Radcliffe-less Harry Potter wouldn't be that hard to duplicate or continue, it seems to me. CGI animation could replace live performance, and a Radcliffe sound-alike could supply the voice. It's not like Radcliffe owns the character. He just played him in the movies.
And you think Disney fans are mutinous? Wait until they are forced to re-cast Harry to keep him looking young... yeah, everyone sees Radcliffe AS HP... that'll be fun. HP fan-bois are just as bad as us Disney ones. Trust me, I know.
Skibum1970
Well-Known Member
I still hold that a Wingrider would make an excellent Avatar coaster. Use a launch to avoid the lift hill (although they could hide the lift hill in a mountain or rock enclosure) and then a speedy ride through the world of Pandora with multiple launches. They could even have an encounter with the big red banshee as a finale.
Lee
Adventurer
Like Furius Baco...but longer and with better theming. (Only Disney and Intamin don't really get along. And B&M won't work with them.)
Turtle
Well-Known Member
yeah! I've been there. their food is amazing especially the ice cream
RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
I actually enjoyed my lunch at Hollywood and Vine 2 years ago. Decent selection, my nephews enjoyed the characters, it was a good time.
DocMcHulk
Well-Known Member
and then kick WDW in a few other places, some of which are far more painful than the face.
SirOinksALot
Active Member
Or the $20 sign would have to go through eight layers of approval and turn into a $200,000 sign.
Turtle
Well-Known Member
well technically it'd be odd if right now they consider the Honey I Shrunk The Kids PlaySet to be part of Pixar Place after putting a new title and new figures. The area that is Pixar Place isn't connected to the playset, so there has to be an expansion of a bigger Pixar Place cause if not then there are like 2 separate Pixar Places... that was hard to understand lol.