networkpro
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Lets see if the stock market sees the announcements as a "hail mary" or react positive with increased stock prices.
I'm thinking that Moana is still the plan BUT they need stuff to announce for next D23 too and this year is very much about things that they have to get started with right now. They knew this year was important but saying they were adding 5 rides to Magic Kingdom over the next few years in 1 go would have definitely been too much and guaranteed that MK would barely be mentioned for the next 2 D23's. Possibly most of WDW with that level of investment.I was thinking how they recently patented a ride system that could be used for that attraction.
That signals to me that the concept is still very much blue sky. Highly unlikely they canceled or axed it considering Moana’s popularity.
Just wasn’t ready to be showcased this time around.
That’s what I’m hoping at least.
That doesn't sell. Sorry to say, it's not the general public who wants that stuff. Is a family going to choose Disney over Universal for "Rhine River Cruise". No. Even if its one of the most elaborate rides. Is Little Suzie going to ask her parents for $100 of Rhine River Merch? No. Put Tangled there and... well now you have a possible yes for both of those.I'm not talking about a new country but adding major attractions to the countries that are already there. Like the Mt Fuji coaster and the Rhine River cruise
In their eyes they did. There were a multitude of reasonsThey didn't HAVE TO rip out Energy to build Guardians.
That’s a great example of one of the biggest changes in how P&R now works. They used to build things we didn’t know we wanted and we fell in love with them. Now they only build things they think we want.That doesn't sell. Sorry to say, it's not the general public who wants that stuff. Is a family going to choose Disney over Universal for "Rhine River Cruise". No. Even if it’s one of the most elaborate rides. Is Little Suzie going to ask her parents for $100 of Rhine River Merch? No. Put Tangled there and... well now you have a possible yes for both of those.
I liked the recent Looney Tunes Cartoons shorts on HBO Max.Look what's been happening to the Looney Tunes gang. One stinkeroo after another.
Wall Street hated the announcement of $60B in the parks despite Iger pointing out that the parks are, right now, the biggest ROI on investment.Lets see if the stock market sees the announcements as a "hail mary" or react positive with increased stock prices.
I know Zootopia gets mentioned a lot for WDW, but having been to the land, it really doesn’t translate well for our parks.Have you heard where in MK?
I think I found people on Twitter who would be OK with it near Tomorrowland.
However, I have noticed that people here think the whole place looks like downtown, and don't realize that there is a rainforest district of folks in treehouses, and literally buildings that look like trees, a district of rivers and canals, a district in the desert, etc. That is, a Zootopia in the west of the park could work visually.
My main point being, in a literal sense, "there is plenty of acreage in Orlando where they could have built Guardians on a fresh pad."In their eyes they did. There were a multitude of reasons
Buybacks do help execs ( not just Disney ) earn more in that stock options ( an huge part of the exec annual compensation ) are more and when they cash in it is substantial.Wall Street hated the announcement of $60B in the parks despite Iger pointing out that the parks are, right now, the biggest ROI on investment.
Wall Street would rather that $60B be spent on buy-backs and dividends, you know, on themselves.
Wall Street day-traders have no concern for the long term health of any business.
Love the Oceania land revival at DAK. While I firmly believe that DAK needs a Lion King attraction, Moana would work great in DAK. Don't get me wrong, Moana would work great in Adventure Land as well but they already have a flume and focus needs to be on the expansions there.After considering what didn't get announced that was rumored, my thoughts have shifted somewhat about where some things should go.
For AK, nix the clone of Paris' Lion King and instead revive the left half of the original blue sky art as an Oceania miniland. Do the Moana flume and move TriceraTop Spin over, converting it to the proposed kakamora spinner.
For MK, subsequently ignore Moana in favor of setting sights on Tomorrowland next. It needs a massive amount of help since many things within (Monsters, Buzz, Speedway) will be redundant in short order.
For EPCOT, find a way to make something for Coco work with Mexico. Yes, I know there are challenges, but with it now not showing at either MK or AK, it feels appropriate to put it on the table once more. This can be way down the road, though. There are obviously far more pressing issues at EPCOT.
I didn’t see so many cheering during the 2008/09 recession where many lost their jobs, homes, and a substantial part of their net worth.When the 2026 recession cancels all these plans
Agree, They will announce some a new land coming to existing parks. Zelda or Pokemon. Maybe even announce a phase 2 expansion at EPIC such as Great Hall at Potter or Luigi's Mansion.So when does Universal make an Epic announcement to control the new cycle? Tomorrow in the morning?
Yes, I know it was a large capacity ride, but there was a time when the line, snaking through the queue was out the door. At the end it was one car full, three cars empty. It could have been the slowest load in the world and it still wouldn't have had much of a line. The problem was that even though there were some diehard fans, like myself, there were not enough of us to pay for the existence of the park much less Horizons.It had a very large hourly capacity which kept the lines down. There was the rumored sinkhole thing, but I think that's been disproven.
Sorry, but I thought we were discussing Epcot. My bad, but what I said about it is still true.The "notable exception" that was hinted at was Splash Mountain.
I cannot make anything out about this except the distant drawing of Big Thunder mtn. way in the back. I also see what I think looks like water so I cannot see where we are losing RoA. That would also mean losing the Liberty Belle.Wow, new artwork for Cars attraction at WDW. Rivers of America will be going away. Silver lining is this will allow a more direct path to Villains are and allow much more expansion area for the build out. View attachment 808598
Welcome to the wonderful world we presently live in.That’s a great example of one of the biggest changes in how P&R now works. They used to build things we didn’t know we wanted and we fell in love with them. Now they only build things they think we want.
Like what some other power people outside of Disney build their " pet projects ". The one thing is after going back and forth these projects at times get approved.Welcome to the wonderful world we presently live in.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.