“And the work comes from the same group that guided the UK's decision to go into lockdown.”
that group included neil ferguson. his modeling always turns out very wrong.
“assume nobody would have changed their behaviour in response to the Covid threat without a lockdown.”
so traditional methods of limiting spread could have been enough. particularly when you consider the data (on fatality rate, etc) we have now that was always likely.
“The study also does not take into account the health consequences of lockdowns that may take years to fully uncover..”
that pretty much speaks for itself.
“The model also predicted that the outbreak would be nearly over by now without lockdown, as so many people would have been infected. ... More than seven in 10 people in the UK would have had Covid, leading to herd immunity and the virus no longer spreading.”
just as many people could die in the long term. lockdowns only prolonged the inevitable but at great cost.
“And it means that as lockdowns start to lift, there is the risk the virus could start to spread again. ... There is a very real risk if mobility goes back up there could be a second wave coming reasonably soon, in the next month or two.”
that is contrary to data we already gained from places where lockdowns were lifted weeks ago.
Mods: this may be controversial, but it is important to hear the other side. it may even be considered political. do show mercy.