Polynesia
Well-Known Member
Very true. With 30,000,000 losing their jobs it’s sad to say this holds true for many businesses and their current/former employees. .DCL will survive, can't say that all DCL cast will make it through.
Very true. With 30,000,000 losing their jobs it’s sad to say this holds true for many businesses and their current/former employees. .DCL will survive, can't say that all DCL cast will make it through.
Thank you. It was a very interesting read. Unfortunately, I think the cruise business is going to be pretty rough for the rest of this year. It depends on international guests and not just locals. Plus what ports will be accepting cruise ships this year? Already the demand for 2021 cruises is up by as much as 40% industry wide. I know I’ll cruise next year once all this craziness is over. Disney will survive, no doubt about that. People want their Disney fix so they’ll come back. The question is how long it will take to get to that point. For now I relive my memories of how much fun our family has had over the years at Disney. And I look forward to when we can all be together again for another Disney vacation
I have been on several Disney cruises and will not go on another until my entire family is vaccinated. Being at sea and getting sick will be less than ideal. I’m hopeful by sometime next year we’ll be able to go. The key to all of this is patience.The cruise industry will certainly take much longer to recover than all other segments of travel and tourism. DCL is in a slightly better position due to targeting a younger demographic. For most cruise lines they are dealing with a large number of people contained in a confined space with common dining areas AND they attract a large percentage of the most vulnerable age population to COVID-19.
Unless there was pre-departure antibody testing followed by daily infection testing of all passengers that don't have antibodies, there is no way I would recommend a cruise to anybody over age 60 until they have been vaccinated. The conditions for an outbreak on a cruise ship are just too ideal.
How about if you are 65 and have tested positive for antibodies? Would you go on a cruise?The cruise industry will certainly take much longer to recover than all other segments of travel and tourism. DCL is in a slightly better position due to targeting a younger demographic. For most cruise lines they are dealing with a large number of people contained in a confined space with common dining areas AND they attract a large percentage of the most vulnerable age population to COVID-19.
Unless there was pre-departure antibody testing followed by daily infection testing of all passengers that don't have antibodies, there is no way I would recommend a cruise to anybody over age 60 until they have been vaccinated. The conditions for an outbreak on a cruise ship are just too ideal.
YesHow about if you are 65 and have tested positive for antibodies? Would you go on a cruise?
Probably but I would have to test positive for antibodies shortly before the cruise. General consensus is that antibodies mean immunity but that it is possible they go away after some time.How about if you are 65 and have tested positive for antibodies? Would you go on a cruise?
Everyone has a differing opinion. Some think June 1 is the date they’ll open. Others think January next year. I’m not sure Disney knows exactly what they’ll do. Shanghai opens next Monday with Hong Kong most likely shortly after them. Disney will probably monitor how that goes. The US parks are different though. China can require their guests to wear masks. Here people are revolting against that. That might be a factor of when to open. I assume Disney is preparing as they are closely watching the numbers. If the numbers spike drastically I can’t see them opening back up this soon. This morning Orange County reported that 90% of their people think things are opening too soon. (According to their poll). And Florida is taking it pretty slow compared to other states. It’s just a wait and see situation for businesses and the public.Hate to be that guy, but as the first post on this thread doesn't show any information itself, and theres 1000 pages on this thread, I have no other way of finding this out, so I have to choice but to ask.
What's the general consensus on what disney will probably do about the coronavirus?
That’s worse news for DLR as they have several parks in CA.This isn't Disney, but Cedar Fair, the owner of Knotts Berry Farm, is saying that some/or all of their parks could remain closed for the rest of 2020. I don't believe they have any parks in the Flordia region but have no doubt that if a big amusement park company is putting it out there, that Disney very much sees their reopening as months away at least.
Knott’s Berry Farm owner says its theme parks could be closed through end of 2020
‘Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have estimated that some or all of our parks may remain closed throughout 2020,’ according to the Cedar Fair first quarter report.www.ocregister.com
Over 33 million now.Very true. With 30,000,000 losing their jobs it’s sad to say this holds true for many businesses and their current/former employees. .
We all know that the funds don't just materialize out of thin air. We pay for them whether it be through taxes or through lower wages at companies. It isn't free...Unless you are an employer you're not paying for anyone. Lucky you!
https://eligibility.com/unemployment/where-do-unemployment-benefit-funds-come-from
I'm not against helping people but the scale of this is just not sustainable. People should not feel free to just "sit at home" and collect unemployment because they are too scared to go to work. The money doesn't just grow on trees and you can be sure we all pay for them to stay at home. That cost is passed on to us all.I suppose that a logical question you might want to ask policy makers is "why can't these homes" get relief from suffering in such extreme circumstances, rather than arguing that others shouldn't get relief and support.
Please stop harping on people collecting unemployment. I don't know a single person who would rather be sitting home right now, and NO ONE asked for the pandemic.I'm not against helping people but the scale of this is just not sustainable. People should not feel free to just "sit at home" and collect unemployment because they are too scared to go to work. The money doesn't just grow on trees and you can be sure we all pay for them to stay at home. That cost is passed on to us all.
Now what happens when there are more people at home collecting than working? The money isn't going to be there for anyone as the working people will lose their jobs and it will all collapse. I hate the sentiment of just let me sit home and collect.
I'm all for helping people in the interim while they find a new job. It should be a safety net not a lifestyle. And the reason why these homes can't get relief is the scale of this. We have never seen this before in our lifetimes and even during the great depression we had a different way of life. We need to be thinking about solutions of how to get people back to work and the economy going again. I'm not saying it should be a free for all but the steps that have been taken for the currently open stores/offices should be applied across the board and allow everyone to get back to work.
A better, more important question, is what happens when everyone returns to work? Do you not understand how contagious this virus is?I'm not against helping people but the scale of this is just not sustainable. People should not feel free to just "sit at home" and collect unemployment because they are too scared to go to work. The money doesn't just grow on trees and you can be sure we all pay for them to stay at home. That cost is passed on to us all.
Now what happens when there are more people at home collecting than working? The money isn't going to be there for anyone as the working people will lose their jobs and it will all collapse. I hate the sentiment of just let me sit home and collect.
I'm all for helping people in the interim while they find a new job. It should be a safety net not a lifestyle. And the reason why these homes can't get relief is the scale of this. We have never seen this before in our lifetimes and even during the great depression we had a different way of life. We need to be thinking about solutions of how to get people back to work and the economy going again. I'm not saying it should be a free for all but the steps that have been taken for the currently open stores/offices should be applied across the board and allow everyone to get back to work.
ThisPlease stop harping on people collecting unemployment. I don't know a single person who would rather be sitting home right now, and NO ONE asked for the pandemic.
Literally nobody knows the answer to your first question. We theorize that cases will spike again after we reopen but think about all the aspects we have gotten wrong to this point. Heck it wasn’t until just a few weeks ago that we discovered that asymptomatic carriers can actually spread the virus. Also, the virus is more contagious than originally estimated but also far less deadly than originally projected. We can’t allow “maybes” and “in theory’s” to control our lives. It’s time to reopen the economy and allow people to get their lives back.A better, more important question, is what happens when everyone returns to work? Do you not understand how contagious this virus is?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.