I don't know what planet you've been living on but I've been reading about asymptomatic spread since the virus arrived in the US.
Probably look at some procedures that essential businesses utilized during this. Grocery stores had to deal with this as an example. That is one component.
The less deadly part is true, and I think all of us are happy about the numbers not being as big as once thought. The deaths may be lower but they are also learning a lot about what this actually does to organs in the body that will affect some, whether young or old, in the future. So it’s serious, not just a death count serious.
I would be FINE with it IF people WOULD FOLLOW THE STINKIN' SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS. (Sorry...not yelling at you.)
I don't think you read my actual response. I'm not harping on people collecting unemployment. My problem is with the statement from the OP of "I’m personally content staying on unemployment" which I have a problem with. No one should be content staying on unemployment. It will just make it worse for everyone in the long run.
Absolutely. And as we've seen with at least 1 Walmart in MA, some companies are better at it than others. I've also read a post recently that had a link to an article about a company telling it's employees that if they want to wear a mask, they'd better stay home.
www.orlandosentinel.com
The bill passed the Senate unanimously. That just doesn’t happen anymore. I would say the vast majority of Americans were probably in favor of it. I don’t really care to debate the merits of a stimulus bill intended to help millions of people pay their bills and feed their families. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. This is not the place for that type of discussion anyway.You really think the majority of Americans want to pay for people to just stay home and not work? I don't know where everyone thinks this money is going to come from... SMH...
I don’t think you read his actual response. He said he’s content to stay on unemployment until it’s safe to go back to work. You conveniently left out the last part because it didn’t fit your narrative. He then clarified that his employer is still closed so he’s not choosing unemployment over work. He has no job to return to yet. Wasn‘t the whole point of the bill that boosted unemployment to bridge the time between when an employer shuts down and when they re-open? What am I missing?
This is the best out there for your question. But there are many out there. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...ce-ferocious-rampage-through-body-brain-toes#
There‘s still so much we don’t know. Every day something new pops up as a possible side effect or new symptom but most of it is not proven yet. Nobody knows the long term effects. The oldest cases are 6 months ago. It will probably be years before we know the full extent. If you look back to what we “knew” in Jan and Feb about the virus three quarters of it has probably already been disproven or changed. Imagine 6 months or a year from now how much will be different.
I just read the whole thing and it was interesting info regarding how other organs are at risk. And I agree that it's a danger that needs to be learned. However, I noticed all the data they're citing is from critical patients in hospitals. And it was always a small percentage of critically ill positive patients, which are already an extremely small percentage of people that have tested positive, which are a smallish percentage of our population. I'll keep looking for data, but I'm more interested in risk of any kind to people that are not in the high risk group (age and pre-existing comorbidities). I'm open to the idea, but haven't seen compelling data to suggest a common risk to people in non-risk groups.
Oooh, I'm afraid I do. Granted, it's just one loser boyfriend of an extended family member, but hey if even I know one...
